CANG
Price
$5.04
Change
+$0.31 (+6.55%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
523.35M
85 days until earnings call
HUT
Price
$25.38
Change
-$0.23 (-0.90%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs HUT

Header iconCANG vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs HUTBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$5.04
Change+$0.31 (+6.55%)
Volume$1.02M
Capitalization523.35M
Hut 8
Price$25.38
Change-$0.23 (-0.90%)
Volume$5.26M
Capitalization2.68B
CANG vs HUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. HUT commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a StrongBuy and HUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $5.04 vs. HUT: $25.38)
Brand notoriety: CANG and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 160% vs. HUT: 104%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $523.35M vs. HUT: $2.68B
CANG [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $523.35M. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than CANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than HUT.

Price Growth

CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.66% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($2.68B) has a higher market cap than CANG($523M). HUT has higher P/E ratio than CANG: HUT (17.75) vs CANG (11.43). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 23.865 vs. CANG (14.545). HUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367M vs. CANG (5.02M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. HUT (216M). HUT has less debt than CANG: HUT (362M) vs CANG (834M). CANG has higher revenues than HUT: CANG (1.79B) vs HUT (550M).
CANGHUTCANG / HUT
Capitalization523M2.68B20%
EBITDA5.02M367M1%
Gain YTD14.54523.86561%
P/E Ratio11.4317.7564%
Revenue1.79B550M326%
Total Cash2.52B216M1,167%
Total Debt834M362M230%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG vs HUT: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7843
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7078
SMR RATING
1..100
9254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
354
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5021

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CANG's Valuation (73) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUT (82) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUT (78) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANG (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (38) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (35) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNCJX20.170.15
+0.75%
Hartford International Growth I
MDRFX22.500.13
+0.58%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Investor A
NEXIX34.640.20
+0.58%
Shelton Sustainable Equity Institutional
OAZMX165.63-0.70
-0.42%
Oakmark R6
ALVIX11.20-0.07
-0.62%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val Inv

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANG has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CANG jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
+6.55%
MARA - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
HUT - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
BITF - CANG
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
CLSK - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
BTBT - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
-0.90%
RIOT - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
HIVE - HUT
79%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
CIFR - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
IREN - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
BITF - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
More