CANG
Price
$4.81
Change
-$0.02 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
499.47M
15 days until earnings call
HUT
Price
$23.32
Change
-$0.48 (-2.02%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs HUT

Header iconCANG vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs HUTBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$4.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.41%)
Volume$502.95K
Capitalization499.47M
Hut 8
Price$23.32
Change-$0.48 (-2.02%)
Volume$4.73M
Capitalization2.46B
CANG vs HUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. HUT commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Hold and HUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $4.81 vs. HUT: $23.32)
Brand notoriety: CANG and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 83% vs. HUT: 93%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $499.47M vs. HUT: $2.46B
CANG [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $499.47M. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CANG and HUT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than CANG.

Price Growth

CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.41% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +19.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($2.46B) has a higher market cap than CANG($499M). HUT has higher P/E ratio than CANG: HUT (16.31) vs CANG (11.43). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 13.812 vs. CANG (9.318). HUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. CANG (5.02M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. HUT (108M). HUT has less debt than CANG: HUT (355M) vs CANG (834M). CANG has higher revenues than HUT: CANG (1.79B) vs HUT (255M).
CANGHUTCANG / HUT
Capitalization499M2.46B20%
EBITDA5.02M119M4%
Gain YTD9.31813.81267%
P/E Ratio11.4316.3170%
Revenue1.79B255M704%
Total Cash2.52B108M2,334%
Total Debt834M355M235%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG vs HUT: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
313
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6778
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
364
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2114

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CANG's Valuation (73) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUT (81) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUT (78) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's SMR Rating (91) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUT (94) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (40) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (36) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APDIX35.430.15
+0.43%
Artisan International Advisor
NUIAX30.910.11
+0.36%
Nuveen International Dividend Growth A
AMGOX23.26-0.06
-0.26%
Alger Mid Cap Growth I-2
EKJCX3.22-0.01
-0.31%
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
HRMDX13.53-0.09
-0.66%
Heartland Mid Cap Value Investor

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANG has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CANG jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
-0.41%
MARA - CANG
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
HUT - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
BITF - CANG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
HIVE - CANG
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
CIFR - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
More

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
-2.02%
RIOT - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
-7.51%
HIVE - HUT
79%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
CIFR - HUT
79%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
IREN - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
BITF - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
More