CANG
Price
$1.39
Change
+$0.02 (+1.46%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
481.43M
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOOD
Price
$118.13
Change
-$2.31 (-1.92%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
106.22B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs HOOD

Header iconCANG vs HOOD Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs HOODBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$1.39
Change+$0.02 (+1.46%)
Volume$667.93K
Capitalization481.43M
Robinhood Markets
Price$118.13
Change-$2.31 (-1.92%)
Volume$12.96M
Capitalization106.22B
CANG vs HOOD Comparison Chart in %
CANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOOD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. HOOD commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Buy and HOOD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $1.39 vs. HOOD: $118.13)
Brand notoriety: CANG and HOOD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 91% vs. HOOD: 48%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $481.43M vs. HOOD: $106.22B
CANG [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $481.43M. HOOD’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $106.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOOD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOOD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOOD is a better buy in the long-term than CANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOOD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOOD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than HOOD.

Price Growth

CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.32% price change this week, while HOOD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

HOOD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOOD($106B) has a higher market cap than CANG($481M). HOOD has higher P/E ratio than CANG: HOOD (49.22) vs CANG (11.51). HOOD YTD gains are higher at: 217.042 vs. CANG (-68.409). HOOD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. CANG (5.02M). HOOD has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. CANG (2.52B). CANG has less debt than HOOD: CANG (834M) vs HOOD (15.7B). HOOD has higher revenues than CANG: HOOD (4.2B) vs CANG (1.79B).
CANGHOODCANG / HOOD
Capitalization481M106B0%
EBITDA5.02M2.09B0%
Gain YTD-68.409217.042-32%
P/E Ratio11.5149.2223%
Revenue1.79B4.2B43%
Total Cash2.52B14.6B17%
Total Debt834M15.7B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGHOOD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOOD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTAP44.850.13
+0.29%
Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April
IBTK19.860.03
+0.13%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Trsry ETF
SCHV29.94-0.01
-0.03%
Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF™
BRKU24.51-0.20
-0.83%
Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares
UFO38.91-1.16
-2.89%
Procure Space ETF

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANG has been loosely correlated with DEFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CANG jumps, then DEFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
+1.46%
DEFT - CANG
41%
Loosely correlated
-9.74%
MARA - CANG
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
CLSK - CANG
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
BTBT - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
HOOD - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
More

HOOD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOOD has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOOD jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOOD
1D Price
Change %
HOOD100%
-1.92%
COIN - HOOD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
IBKR - HOOD
74%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
HUT - HOOD
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.98%
MS - HOOD
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
GS - HOOD
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More