CANG
Price
$4.02
Change
-$0.08 (-1.95%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
712.61M
63 days until earnings call
CLSK
Price
$12.96
Change
-$0.72 (-5.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.64B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs CLSK

Header iconCANG vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs CLSKBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$4.02
Change-$0.08 (-1.95%)
Volume$457.85K
Capitalization712.61M
CleanSpark
Price$12.96
Change-$0.72 (-5.26%)
Volume$35.21M
Capitalization3.64B
CANG vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. CLSK commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Buy and CLSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $4.02 vs. CLSK: $12.96)
Brand notoriety: CANG and CLSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 89% vs. CLSK: 152%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $712.61M vs. CLSK: $3.64B
CANG [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $712.61M. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the long-term than CANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.66% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($3.64B) has a higher market cap than CANG($713M). CLSK has higher P/E ratio than CANG: CLSK (15.07) vs CANG (11.43). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 40.717 vs. CANG (-8.636). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. CANG (5.02M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. CLSK (916M). CLSK (820M) and CANG (834M) have identical debt. CANG has higher revenues than CLSK: CANG (1.79B) vs CLSK (632M).
CANGCLSKCANG / CLSK
Capitalization713M3.64B20%
EBITDA5.02M626M1%
Gain YTD-8.63640.717-21%
P/E Ratio11.4315.0776%
Revenue1.79B632M284%
Total Cash2.52B916M275%
Total Debt834M820M102%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8191
SMR RATING
1..100
9252
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3622
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CANG's Valuation (73) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (73) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (91) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANG (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (50) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (36) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIAHX14.970.19
+1.29%
Hartford Healthcare HLS IA
CVKFX16.800.15
+0.90%
Victory Pioneer Disciplined Value R6
LVOFX19.660.17
+0.87%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F
IUTCX28.750.20
+0.70%
Invesco Dividend Income C
FBAKX32.590.10
+0.31%
Fidelity Balanced K

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANG has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CANG jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
-1.95%
MARA - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
HUT - CANG
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.93%
CLSK - CANG
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.26%
BTBT - CANG
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
NCTY - CANG
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-5.26%
COIN - CLSK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
MARA - CLSK
71%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
RIOT - CLSK
68%
Closely correlated
+5.68%
BITF - CLSK
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.22%
BTBT - CLSK
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More