CANG
Price
$4.98
Change
-$0.19 (-3.68%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
204.82M
35 days until earnings call
CASY
Price
$527.51
Change
+$1.45 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.67B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs CASY

Header iconCANG vs CASY Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs CASYBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$4.98
Change-$0.19 (-3.68%)
Volume$435.49K
Capitalization204.82M
Casey's General Stores
Price$527.51
Change+$1.45 (+0.28%)
Volume$280.32K
Capitalization11.67B
CANG vs CASY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. CASY commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Hold and CASY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $4.98 vs. CASY: $527.51)
Brand notoriety: CANG and CASY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 74% vs. CASY: 70%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $204.82M vs. CASY: $11.67B
CANG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $204.82M. CASY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $11.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCASY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CASY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASY is a better buy in the long-term than CANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CASY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CASY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than CASY.

Price Growth

CANG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.39% price change this week, while CASY (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

CASY is expected to report earnings on Sep 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+4.47% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASY($11.7B) has a higher market cap than CANG($205M). CASY has higher P/E ratio than CANG: CASY (25.06) vs CANG (20.92). CASY YTD gains are higher at: 33.434 vs. CANG (13.182). CASY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. CANG (-248.35M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. CASY (178M). CANG has less debt than CASY: CANG (431M) vs CASY (1.64B). CASY has higher revenues than CANG: CASY (14.6B) vs CANG (2.12B).
CANGCASYCANG / CASY
Capitalization205M11.7B2%
EBITDA-248.35M1.01B-25%
Gain YTD13.18233.43439%
P/E Ratio20.9225.0683%
Revenue2.12B14.6B15%
Total Cash2.65B178M1,486%
Total Debt431M1.64B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG vs CASY: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
CASY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
672
SMR RATING
1..100
8951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4024
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CANG's Valuation (44) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASY (89) in the Food Retail industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASY’s over the last 12 months.

CASY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANG (67) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CASY's SMR Rating (51) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANG (89) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CASY (44) in the Food Retail industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.

CASY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as CANG (40) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGCASY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGRP0.01N/A
N/A
Bluestem Group Inc.
PSMMF17.56N/A
N/A
Persimmon Plc
BINP0.03N/A
N/A
Bionoid Pharma Inc.
TSCDY17.35-0.04
-0.23%
Tesco PLC
CGIFF8.15-0.05
-0.61%
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANG and RUSHB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANG and RUSHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
-3.68%
RUSHB - CANG
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
WSM - CANG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BARK - CANG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNSO - CANG
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
CASY - CANG
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

CASY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASY has been loosely correlated with MUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASY jumps, then MUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASY
1D Price
Change %
CASY100%
+0.28%
MUSA - CASY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
BNED - CASY
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
NAAS - CASY
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
TSCO - CASY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FND - CASY
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More