CANG
Price
$3.10
Change
-$0.29 (-8.55%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
204.82M
CASY
Price
$381.68
Change
-$17.05 (-4.28%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.67B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

CANG vs CASY

Header iconCANG vs CASY Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs CASYBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$3.10
Change-$0.29 (-8.55%)
Volume$2.53K
Capitalization204.82M
Casey's General Stores
Price$381.68
Change-$17.05 (-4.28%)
Volume$7.56K
Capitalization11.67B
CANG vs CASY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. CASY commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Hold and CASY is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $3.15 vs. CASY: $408.03)
Brand notoriety: CANG and CASY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 60% vs. CASY: 97%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $204.82M vs. CASY: $11.67B
CANG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $204.82M. CASY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $11.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCASY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CASY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASY is a better buy in the long-term than CANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CASY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CASY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASY is a better buy in the short-term than CANG.

Price Growth

CANG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -9.48% price change this week, while CASY (@Specialty Stores) price change was -3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

CASY is expected to report earnings on Jun 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.45% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASY($11.7B) has a higher market cap than CANG($205M). CASY has higher P/E ratio than CANG: CASY (25.06) vs CANG (20.92). CASY YTD gains are higher at: 3.100 vs. CANG (-28.409). CASY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. CANG (-248.35M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. CASY (178M). CANG has less debt than CASY: CANG (431M) vs CASY (1.64B). CASY has higher revenues than CANG: CASY (14.6B) vs CANG (2.12B).
CANGCASYCANG / CASY
Capitalization205M11.7B2%
EBITDA-248.35M1.01B-25%
Gain YTD-28.4093.100-916%
P/E Ratio20.9225.0683%
Revenue2.12B14.6B15%
Total Cash2.65B178M1,486%
Total Debt431M1.64B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG vs CASY: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
CASY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
923
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1131
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CANG's Valuation (57) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CASY (80) in the Food Retail industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.

CASY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Food Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for CANG (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew significantly faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CASY's SMR Rating (100) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as CANG (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CASY (48) in the Food Retail industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CASY (31) in the Food Retail industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGCASY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
84%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X87222.1950001156.515600
+1.34%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME24.30-0.10
-0.41%
GameStop Corp
AAPL235.93-2.10
-0.88%
Apple
SPY576.86-6.91
-1.18%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA272.04-12.61
-4.43%
Tesla

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANG and RUSHB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANG and RUSHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
-1.87%
RUSHB - CANG
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
BARK - CANG
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
CASY - CANG
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
RUSHA - CANG
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
KAR - CANG
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
More

CASY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASY has been loosely correlated with MUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASY jumps, then MUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASY
1D Price
Change %
CASY100%
+0.01%
MUSA - CASY
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
BNED - CASY
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
NAAS - CASY
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
FND - CASY
33%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
IHCPF - CASY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More