It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CANF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CANF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CANF (@Biotechnology) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while UBX (@Biotechnology) price change was +6.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -5.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.65%.
CANF is expected to report earnings on Jun 01, 2023.
UBX is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
CANF | UBX | CANF / UBX | |
Capitalization | 13.1M | 21.2M | 62% |
EBITDA | N/A | -20.99M | - |
Gain YTD | -9.545 | -34.715 | 27% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 995K | 29M | 3% |
Total Debt | 40K | 20.7M | 0% |
CANF | UBX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UBX's Valuation (48) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CANF (52). This means that UBX’s stock grew similarly to CANF’s over the last 12 months.
UBX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CANF (100). This means that UBX’s stock grew similarly to CANF’s over the last 12 months.
UBX's SMR Rating (98) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CANF (98). This means that UBX’s stock grew similarly to CANF’s over the last 12 months.
CANF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as UBX (78). This means that CANF’s stock grew similarly to UBX’s over the last 12 months.
CANF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as UBX (100). This means that CANF’s stock grew similarly to UBX’s over the last 12 months.
CANF | UBX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CANF and LGVN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANF and LGVN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CANF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CANF | 100% | -3.86% | ||
LGVN - CANF | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
RNA - CANF | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
ZLAB - CANF | 25% Poorly correlated | -10.95% | ||
UBX - CANF | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.82% | ||
IMTX - CANF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBX has been loosely correlated with COGT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBX jumps, then COGT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UBX | 100% | -3.82% | ||
COGT - UBX | 37% Loosely correlated | -7.21% | ||
KOD - UBX | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.64% | ||
HOFBF - UBX | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CHRS - UBX | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
ARCT - UBX | 33% Poorly correlated | -4.38% | ||
More |