CAN vs IONQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAN is a Hold and IONQ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIONQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IONQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IONQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IONQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CAN (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +17.39% price change this week, while IONQ (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +32.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +13.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +90.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +227.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.
IONQ is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (+13.84% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| CAN | IONQ | CAN / IONQ | |
| Capitalization | 356M | 2.08B | 17% |
| EBITDA | -82.68M | -147.38M | 56% |
| Gain YTD | 28.571 | 253.834 | 11% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.44 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 488M | 22M | 2,218% |
| Total Cash | 66.1M | 355M | 19% |
| Total Debt | 2.42M | 8.11M | 30% |
| CAN | IONQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
CAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAN has been loosely correlated with EBON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAN jumps, then EBON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAN | 100% | -3.88% | ||
| EBON - CAN | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.82% | ||
| CRSR - CAN | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| DDD - CAN | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.04% | ||
| IONQ - CAN | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.86% | ||
| QBTS - CAN | 27% Poorly correlated | +16.18% | ||
More | ||||
IONQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been loosely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IONQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONQ | 100% | +4.86% | ||
| QBTS - IONQ | 50% Loosely correlated | +16.18% | ||
| RGTI - IONQ | 46% Loosely correlated | +32.03% | ||
| CRSR - IONQ | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| QUBT - IONQ | 39% Loosely correlated | +51.53% | ||
| CAN - IONQ | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.88% | ||
More | ||||