CAN
Price
$0.84
Change
-$0.08 (-8.70%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
570.16M
121 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CREAF
Price
$0.44
Change
+$0.03 (+7.32%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
Capitalization
30.51M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAN vs CREAF

Header iconCAN vs CREAF Comparison
Open Charts CAN vs CREAFBanner chart's image
Canaan
Price$0.84
Change-$0.08 (-8.70%)
Volume$28.75M
Capitalization570.16M
Creative Technology
Price$0.44
Change+$0.03 (+7.32%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization30.51M
CAN vs CREAF Comparison Chart in %
CAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CREAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAN vs. CREAF commentary
Dec 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAN is a Hold and CREAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CAN: $0.92 vs. CREAF: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: CAN and CREAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAN: 43% vs. CREAF: 39%
Market capitalization -- CAN: $570.16M vs. CREAF: $30.51M
CAN [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $570.16M. CREAF’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $30.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $157.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $13.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCREAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CREAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAN is a better buy in the long-term than CREAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CREAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CREAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAN is a better buy in the short-term than CREAF.

Price Growth

CAN (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while CREAF (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -5.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+1.20% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAN($570M) has a higher market cap than CREAF($30.5M). CREAF YTD gains are higher at: -44.620 vs. CAN (-54.917). CREAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.04M vs. CAN (-184.66M). CAN has more cash in the bank: 119M vs. CREAF (29.8M). CREAF has less debt than CAN: CREAF (970K) vs CAN (47.7M). CAN has higher revenues than CREAF: CAN (345M) vs CREAF (67.4M).
CANCREAFCAN / CREAF
Capitalization570M30.5M1,869%
EBITDA-184.66M-9.04M2,043%
Gain YTD-54.917-44.620123%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue345M67.4M512%
Total Cash119M29.8M399%
Total Debt47.7M970K4,918%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAN vs CREAF: Fundamental Ratings
CAN
CREAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
538
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAN's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CREAF (43). This means that CAN’s stock grew similarly to CREAF’s over the last 12 months.

CAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CREAF (100). This means that CAN’s stock grew similarly to CREAF’s over the last 12 months.

CREAF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CAN (97). This means that CREAF’s stock grew similarly to CAN’s over the last 12 months.

CAN's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CREAF (64). This means that CAN’s stock grew similarly to CREAF’s over the last 12 months.

CAN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CREAF (99). This means that CAN’s stock grew significantly faster than CREAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANCREAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CREAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGLAX19.370.10
+0.52%
Calvert Global Equity Fund Class A
FVSKX60.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value Strategies K
GLVYX93.81-0.06
-0.06%
Invesco Global Focus Y
MIOFX31.09-0.05
-0.16%
Marsico International Opportunities
VGICX73.33-2.84
-3.73%
JPMorgan US Value C

CAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAN has been loosely correlated with HPQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAN jumps, then HPQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAN
1D Price
Change %
CAN100%
-1.75%
HPQ - CAN
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
EBON - CAN
39%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
IONQ - CAN
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
QBTS - CAN
38%
Loosely correlated
+4.40%
RGTI - CAN
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
More

CREAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CREAF and HAUP have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CREAF and HAUP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CREAF
1D Price
Change %
CREAF100%
N/A
HAUP - CREAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QMCO - CREAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
AGMH - CREAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
DELL - CREAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
CAN - CREAF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
More