CAMNF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
WRLGF
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.02 (-4.88%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CAMNF vs WRLGF

Header iconCAMNF vs WRLGF Comparison
Open Charts CAMNF vs WRLGFBanner chart's image
CASCADIA MINERALS
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
CapitalizationN/A
WEST RED LAKE GOLD MINES
Price$0.39
Change-$0.02 (-4.88%)
Volume$410.37K
CapitalizationN/A
CAMNF vs WRLGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAMNF vs. WRLGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAMNF is a Hold and WRLGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CAMNF: $0.07 vs. WRLGF: $0.39)
Brand notoriety: CAMNF and WRLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAMNF: 53% vs. WRLGF: 79%
Market capitalization -- CAMNF: $0 vs. WRLGF: $90.7M
CAMNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. WRLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $90.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAMNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAMNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAMNF is a better buy in the long-term than WRLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WRLGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WRLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CAMNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.77% price change this week, while WRLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRLGF YTD gains are higher at: -36.467 vs. CAMNF (-76.093).
CAMNFWRLGFCAMNF / WRLGF
CapitalizationN/A90.7M-
EBITDAN/A-2.23M-
Gain YTD-76.093-36.467209%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A4.36M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WRLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

CAMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAMNF and LONCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAMNF and LONCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAMNF
1D Price
Change %
CAMNF100%
N/A
LONCF - CAMNF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
HUMRF - CAMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+38.46%
WRLGF - CAMNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
DOLLF - CAMNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
CPNFF - CAMNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.43%
More

WRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLGF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLGF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLGF
1D Price
Change %
WRLGF100%
-3.28%
KNTNF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
WDOFF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
AYASF - WRLGF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
CXBMF - WRLGF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
TORXF - WRLGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More