CAMLF
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.10 (-4.76%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
637.37M
GMBXF
Price
$5.58
Change
-$0.05 (-0.89%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
40.64B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAMLF vs GMBXF

Header iconCAMLF vs GMBXF Comparison
Open Charts CAMLF vs GMBXFBanner chart's image
Central Asia Metals Ltd, London
Price$2.00
Change-$0.10 (-4.76%)
Volume$12.7K
Capitalization637.37M
Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$5.58
Change-$0.05 (-0.89%)
Volume$1.68K
Capitalization40.64B
CAMLF vs GMBXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAMLF vs. GMBXF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAMLF is a Hold and GMBXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CAMLF: $2.00 vs. GMBXF: $5.58)
Brand notoriety: CAMLF and GMBXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAMLF: 46% vs. GMBXF: 14%
Market capitalization -- CAMLF: $637.37M vs. GMBXF: $40.64B
CAMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $637.37M. GMBXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $40.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMBXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBXF is a better buy in the long-term than CAMLF.

Price Growth

CAMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMBXF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBXF($40.6B) has a higher market cap than CAMLF($637M). GMBXF has higher P/E ratio than CAMLF: GMBXF (12.74) vs CAMLF (4.41). GMBXF YTD gains are higher at: 18.977 vs. CAMLF (4.712). GMBXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.1B vs. CAMLF (166M). GMBXF has more cash in the bank: 6.63B vs. CAMLF (51M). CAMLF has less debt than GMBXF: CAMLF (12.6M) vs GMBXF (8.82B). GMBXF has higher revenues than CAMLF: GMBXF (14B) vs CAMLF (236M).
CAMLFGMBXFCAMLF / GMBXF
Capitalization637M40.6B2%
EBITDA166M7.1B2%
Gain YTD4.71218.97725%
P/E Ratio4.4112.7435%
Revenue236M14B2%
Total Cash51M6.63B1%
Total Debt12.6M8.82B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMBXF: Fundamental Ratings
GMBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIKIX46.52-0.30
-0.64%
Fidelity Advisor Utilities Z
HFLGX11.28-0.09
-0.79%
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Inv
LAIDX9.51-0.13
-1.35%
Lord Abbett International Value I
PGTIX21.54-0.36
-1.64%
T. Rowe Price Global Technology I
KOOYF0.90-0.02
-2.22%
Kootenay Silver, Inc.

CAMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAMLF and DWMNF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAMLF and DWMNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAMLF
1D Price
Change %
CAMLF100%
N/A
DWMNF - CAMLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMBXF - CAMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
HRFEF - CAMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCX - CAMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
DETRF - CAMLF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
More

GMBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMBXF has been loosely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMBXF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBXF
1D Price
Change %
GMBXF100%
-0.89%
IVPAF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
LUNMF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
GLNCY - GMBXF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
CSCCF - GMBXF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
GLCNF - GMBXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
More