Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAML vs IWF
CAML vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts CAML vs IWF
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$36.54
Change-$0.28 (-0.76%)
Volume$100
Net Assets308.88M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$428.27
Change+$4.75 (+1.12%)
Volume$567.68K
Net Assets112.55B
CAML vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAML vs. IWF commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAML is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. CAML (309M). CAML has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: CAML (8.454) vs IWF (6.864). CAML was incepted earlier than IWF: CAML (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CAML (0.65). CAML has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| CAML | IWF | CAML / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 8.454 | 6.864 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 309M | 113B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.19 | 342% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 12.00 | 275% |
| Yield | 0.05 | 0.42 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CAML | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 70% | 18 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CAML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAML has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAML jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAML | 100% | +1.24% | ||
| PH - CAML | 82% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| ETN - CAML | 81% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| GS - CAML | 78% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| AMZN - CAML | 78% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| META - CAML | 77% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||