CALZF
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.11 (-12.22%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
539.58M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SERA
Price
$2.95
Change
-$0.17 (-5.45%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
112.28M
131 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CALZF vs SERA

Header iconCALZF vs SERA Comparison
Open Charts CALZF vs SERABanner chart's image
Polynovo
Price$0.79
Change-$0.11 (-12.22%)
Volume$750
Capitalization539.58M
Sera Prognostics
Price$2.95
Change-$0.17 (-5.45%)
Volume$14.53K
Capitalization112.28M
CALZF vs SERA Comparison Chart in %
CALZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SERA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CALZF vs. SERA commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CALZF is a Hold and SERA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CALZF: $0.79 vs. SERA: $3.12)
Brand notoriety: CALZF and SERA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CALZF: 26% vs. SERA: 62%
Market capitalization -- CALZF: $539.58M vs. SERA: $112.28M
CALZF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $539.58M. SERA’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $112.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $224.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CALZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSERA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CALZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SERA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CALZF is a better buy in the long-term than SERA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CALZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SERA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CALZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SERA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SERA is a better buy in the short-term than CALZF.

Price Growth

CALZF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -11.85% price change this week, while SERA (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

SERA is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.41% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CALZF($540M) has a higher market cap than SERA($112M). CALZF YTD gains are higher at: -23.942 vs. SERA (-61.671). CALZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5M vs. SERA (-31.85M). SERA has more cash in the bank: 40.2M vs. CALZF (33.6M). SERA has less debt than CALZF: SERA (351K) vs CALZF (17.1M). CALZF has higher revenues than SERA: CALZF (127M) vs SERA (108K).
CALZFSERACALZF / SERA
Capitalization540M112M482%
EBITDA10.5M-31.85M-33%
Gain YTD-23.942-61.67139%
P/E Ratio64.03N/A-
Revenue127M108K117,593%
Total Cash33.6M40.2M84%
Total Debt17.1M351K4,872%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CALZF: Fundamental Ratings
CALZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CALZFSERA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CALZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SERA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMUEX15.300.04
+0.26%
GMO US Equity III
MSTQX14.22N/A
N/A
Morningstar US Equity
SWSSX39.71-0.12
-0.30%
Schwab Small Cap Index
BGGSX30.29-0.26
-0.85%
Baillie Gifford US Equity Growth I
NBRIX13.74-0.12
-0.87%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate I

CALZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CALZF and SERA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CALZF and SERA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CALZF
1D Price
Change %
CALZF100%
N/A
SERA - CALZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+15.99%
BBLG - CALZF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
CHEOF - CALZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHEOY - CALZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
CBSC - CALZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
More

SERA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SERA has been loosely correlated with VAPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SERA jumps, then VAPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SERA
1D Price
Change %
SERA100%
+15.99%
VAPO - SERA
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMIX - SERA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
UTMD - SERA
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
CORBF - SERA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNOX - SERA
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
More