CALRF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
SWLFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

CALRF vs SWLFF

Header iconCALRF vs SWLFF Comparison
Open Charts CALRF vs SWLFFBanner chart's image
Calidus Resources
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$125K
CapitalizationN/A
Silver Wolf Exploration
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$9.92K
CapitalizationN/A
CALRF vs SWLFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CALRF vs. SWLFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CALRF is a Hold and SWLFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CALRF: $0.09 vs. SWLFF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: CALRF and SWLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CALRF: 100% vs. SWLFF: 35%
Market capitalization -- CALRF: $52.5M vs. SWLFF: $2.16M
CALRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $52.5M. SWLFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CALRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWLFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CALRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CALRF is a better buy in the long-term than SWLFF.

Price Growth

CALRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWLFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CALRF($52.5M) has a higher market cap than SWLFF($2.16M). SWLFF YTD gains are higher at: 30.005 vs. CALRF (-34.571). SWLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -559.93K vs. CALRF (-8.07M). CALRF has more cash in the bank: 7.05M vs. SWLFF (163K). SWLFF has less debt than CALRF: SWLFF (17.9K) vs CALRF (2.93M). CALRF has higher revenues than SWLFF: CALRF (385K) vs SWLFF (0).
CALRFSWLFFCALRF / SWLFF
Capitalization52.5M2.16M2,433%
EBITDA-8.07M-559.93K1,441%
Gain YTD-34.57130.005-115%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue385K0-
Total Cash7.05M163K4,327%
Total Debt2.93M17.9K16,341%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWLFF: Fundamental Ratings
SWLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

CALRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CALRF has been loosely correlated with NPTLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CALRF jumps, then NPTLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CALRF
1D Price
Change %
CALRF100%
N/A
NPTLF - CALRF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GGLDF - CALRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
FFOXF - CALRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.14%
NSGCF - CALRF
30%
Poorly correlated
-9.59%
SWLFF - CALRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWLFF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWLFF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWLFF
1D Price
Change %
SWLFF100%
N/A
CALRF - SWLFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOLLF - SWLFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
GSVRF - SWLFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
WTHVF - SWLFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
HCHDF - SWLFF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
More