Advertisement
CAL vs SHOO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAL is a StrongBuy and SHOO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHOO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHOO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHOO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SHOO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CAL (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while SHOO (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -0.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.47%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAL is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.
SHOO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+1.60% weekly)Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
@Wholesale Distributors (+2.07% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
| CAL | SHOO | CAL / SHOO | |
| Capitalization | 370M | 2.78B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 143M | 160M | 89% |
| Gain YTD | -50.537 | -6.588 | 767% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.20 | 49.00 | 13% |
| Revenue | 2.65B | 2.32B | 114% |
| Total Cash | 191M | 123M | 155% |
| Total Debt | 969M | 539M | 180% |
CAL | SHOO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAL's Valuation (16) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as SHOO (39). This means that CAL’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.
SHOO's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as CAL (92). This means that SHOO’s stock grew similarly to CAL’s over the last 12 months.
SHOO's SMR Rating (67) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as CAL (72). This means that SHOO’s stock grew similarly to CAL’s over the last 12 months.
SHOO's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAL (87). This means that SHOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAL’s over the last 12 months.
SHOO's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAL (51). This means that SHOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAL’s over the last 12 months.
| CAL | SHOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JFNAX | 79.26 | 0.71 | +0.90% |
| Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences A | |||
| ACVDX | 11.40 | 0.09 | +0.80% |
| American Century International Val R6 | |||
| LICCX | 18.70 | 0.13 | +0.70% |
| Lord Abbett International Equity C | |||
| SPHDF | 12.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Santhera Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd. | |||
| FBPI | 11.26 | -0.13 | -1.14% |
| First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc. | |||
CAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAL has been closely correlated with DBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAL jumps, then DBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAL | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| DBI - CAL | 67% Closely correlated | +6.32% | ||
| SCVL - CAL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| ZUMZ - CAL | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| SHOO - CAL | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| GCO - CAL | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.55% | ||
More | ||||
SHOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOO has been loosely correlated with OXM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHOO jumps, then OXM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOO | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| OXM - SHOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| KTB - SHOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| COLM - SHOO | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| DBI - SHOO | 61% Loosely correlated | +6.32% | ||
| NKE - SHOO | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||