CAL
Price
$15.70
Change
+$1.46 (+10.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
530.61M
79 days until earnings call
LVLU
Price
$4.01
Change
+$0.13 (+3.35%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.02M
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAL vs LVLU

Header iconCAL vs LVLU Comparison
Open Charts CAL vs LVLUBanner chart's image
Caleres
Price$15.70
Change+$1.46 (+10.25%)
Volume$1.37M
Capitalization530.61M
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings
Price$4.01
Change+$0.13 (+3.35%)
Volume$30.33K
Capitalization11.02M
CAL vs LVLU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVLU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAL vs. LVLU commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAL is a Hold and LVLU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CAL: $15.70 vs. LVLU: $4.01)
Brand notoriety: CAL and LVLU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAL: 190% vs. LVLU: 10%
Market capitalization -- CAL: $530.61M vs. LVLU: $11.02M
CAL [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $530.61M. LVLU’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $11.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $154.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $14.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVLU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAL is a better buy in the long-term than LVLU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVLU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LVLU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAL is a better buy in the short-term than LVLU.

Price Growth

CAL (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +4.67% price change this week, while LVLU (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAL is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

LVLU is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+1.63% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAL($531M) has a higher market cap than LVLU($11M). CAL YTD gains are higher at: -31.582 vs. LVLU (-76.342). CAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 175M vs. LVLU (-45.73M). CAL has more cash in the bank: 33.1M vs. LVLU (1.53M). LVLU has less debt than CAL: LVLU (25.2M) vs CAL (850M). CAL has higher revenues than LVLU: CAL (2.68B) vs LVLU (292M).
CALLVLUCAL / LVLU
Capitalization531M11M4,827%
EBITDA175M-45.73M-383%
Gain YTD-31.582-76.34241%
P/E Ratio8.92N/A-
Revenue2.68B292M917%
Total Cash33.1M1.53M2,158%
Total Debt850M25.2M3,373%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAL: Fundamental Ratings
CAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CALLVLU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVLU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KYMR43.511.31
+3.10%
Kymera Therapeutics
AGEN4.330.04
+0.93%
Agenus
GCMG12.770.05
+0.39%
GCM Grosvenor
XTLB1.25N/A
N/A
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd
CG63.75-1.18
-1.82%
Carlyle Group (The)

CAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAL has been loosely correlated with SCVL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAL jumps, then SCVL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAL
1D Price
Change %
CAL100%
+10.25%
SCVL - CAL
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.94%
ZUMZ - CAL
52%
Loosely correlated
+15.50%
BKE - CAL
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
GCO - CAL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
GES - CAL
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

LVLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVLU and BOZTY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVLU and BOZTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVLU
1D Price
Change %
LVLU100%
+3.35%
BOZTY - LVLU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROST - LVLU
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
RENT - LVLU
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
CAL - LVLU
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.25%
LULU - LVLU
20%
Poorly correlated
-18.58%
More