CAJPY
Price
$28.84
Change
+$0.16 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.07B
17 days until earnings call
NTAP
Price
$107.61
Change
+$0.35 (+0.33%)
Updated
Jul 7, 11:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.68B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAJPY vs NTAP

Header iconCAJPY vs NTAP Comparison
Open Charts CAJPY vs NTAPBanner chart's image
Canon
Price$28.84
Change+$0.16 (+0.56%)
Volume$30.94K
Capitalization26.07B
NetApp
Price$107.61
Change+$0.35 (+0.33%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization21.68B
CAJPY vs NTAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAJPY vs. NTAP commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAJPY is a Hold and NTAP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CAJPY: $28.84 vs. NTAP: $107.26)
Brand notoriety: CAJPY: Not notable vs. NTAP: Notable
Both companies represent the Computer Peripherals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAJPY: 49% vs. NTAP: 43%
Market capitalization -- CAJPY: $26.07B vs. NTAP: $21.68B
CAJPY [@Computer Peripherals] is valued at $26.07B. NTAP’s [@Computer Peripherals] market capitalization is $21.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Peripherals] industry ranges from $262.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Peripherals] industry is $10.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAJPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAJPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NTAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CAJPY and NTAP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAJPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAJPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTAP is a better buy in the short-term than CAJPY.

Price Growth

CAJPY (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while NTAP (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAJPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

NTAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Peripherals (+1.85% weekly)

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAJPY($26.1B) has a higher market cap than NTAP($21.7B). NTAP has higher P/E ratio than CAJPY: NTAP (23.92) vs CAJPY (14.06). NTAP YTD gains are higher at: -6.133 vs. CAJPY (-11.408). CAJPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 616B vs. NTAP (1.52B). CAJPY has more cash in the bank: 545B vs. NTAP (2.92B). NTAP has less debt than CAJPY: NTAP (2.66B) vs CAJPY (663B). CAJPY has higher revenues than NTAP: CAJPY (4.15T) vs NTAP (6.18B).
CAJPYNTAPCAJPY / NTAP
Capitalization26.1B21.7B120%
EBITDA616B1.52B40,580%
Gain YTD-11.408-6.133186%
P/E Ratio14.0623.9259%
Revenue4.15T6.18B67,060%
Total Cash545B2.92B18,684%
Total Debt663B2.66B24,962%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAJPY vs NTAP: Fundamental Ratings
CAJPY
NTAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3036
SMR RATING
1..100
6913
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2189
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAJPY's Valuation (7) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (66) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

CAJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NTAP (36) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

NTAP's SMR Rating (13) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAJPY (69) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.

NTAP's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as CAJPY (61) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.

CAJPY's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTAP (89) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAJPYNTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLBZ5.330.10
+1.91%
Glen Burnie Bancorp
SR74.060.65
+0.89%
Spire
TTWO239.51N/A
N/A
Take-Two Interactive Software
GLDG0.73N/A
-0.27%
GoldMining
RERE3.48-0.03
-0.85%
ATRenew

CAJPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAJPY and SEKEY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAJPY and SEKEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAJPY
1D Price
Change %
CAJPY100%
+0.56%
SEKEY - CAJPY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
STX - CAJPY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
NTAP - CAJPY
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
ANET - CAJPY
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
NNDM - CAJPY
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
More

NTAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTAP has been closely correlated with PSTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTAP jumps, then PSTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTAP
1D Price
Change %
NTAP100%
+0.16%
PSTG - NTAP
73%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
DELL - NTAP
68%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
HPQ - NTAP
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
WDC - NTAP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
STX - NTAP
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
More