CAJPY
Price
$29.89
Change
+$0.52 (+1.77%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
26.83B
45 days until earnings call
NTAP
Price
$121.18
Change
+$2.43 (+2.05%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.19B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAJPY vs NTAP

Header iconCAJPY vs NTAP Comparison
Open Charts CAJPY vs NTAPBanner chart's image
Canon
Price$29.89
Change+$0.52 (+1.77%)
Volume$30.2K
Capitalization26.83B
NetApp
Price$121.18
Change+$2.43 (+2.05%)
Volume$56.48K
Capitalization24.19B
CAJPY vs NTAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAJPY vs. NTAP commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAJPY is a StrongBuy and NTAP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CAJPY: $29.89 vs. NTAP: $118.75)
Brand notoriety: CAJPY: Not notable vs. NTAP: Notable
CAJPY represents the Computer Processing Hardware, while NTAP is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAJPY: 45% vs. NTAP: 82%
Market capitalization -- CAJPY: $26.83B vs. NTAP: $23.7B
CAJPY [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $26.83B. NTAP’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $23.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $179.54B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $12.04B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAJPY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNTAP’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CAJPY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NTAP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CAJPY and NTAP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAJPY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTAP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAJPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTAP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTAP is a better buy in the short-term than CAJPY.

Price Growth

CAJPY (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +1.98% price change this week, while NTAP (@Computer Communications) price change was +5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAJPY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

NTAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (-0.75% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

@Computer Communications (+2.23% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAJPY($26.8B) has a higher market cap than NTAP($24.2B). CAJPY has higher P/E ratio than NTAP: CAJPY (24.30) vs NTAP (21.45). NTAP YTD gains are higher at: 3.922 vs. CAJPY (-6.444). CAJPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 538B vs. NTAP (1.7B). CAJPY has more cash in the bank: 722B vs. NTAP (3.32B). NTAP has less debt than CAJPY: NTAP (2.75B) vs CAJPY (1.12T). CAJPY has higher revenues than NTAP: CAJPY (4.55T) vs NTAP (6.59B).
CAJPYNTAPCAJPY / NTAP
Capitalization26.8B24.2B111%
EBITDA538B1.7B31,722%
Gain YTD-6.4443.922-164%
P/E Ratio24.3021.45113%
Revenue4.55T6.59B69,074%
Total Cash722B3.32B21,721%
Total Debt1.12T2.75B40,729%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAJPY vs NTAP: Fundamental Ratings
CAJPY
NTAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2132
SMR RATING
1..100
513
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6017
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1761
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAJPY's Valuation (5) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NTAP (19) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

CAJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NTAP (32) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

CAJPY's SMR Rating (5) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NTAP (13) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

NTAP's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAJPY (60) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.

CAJPY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (61) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAJPYNTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAJPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRF15.870.29
+1.89%
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
MARU26.36N/A
N/A
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncMarETF
SIXH39.10-0.05
-0.14%
ETC 6 Meridian Hdg Eq-Idx Opt Strat ETF
PVAL41.78-0.24
-0.57%
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
MDST26.51-0.18
-0.66%
Westwood Salient Enhanced Mid Inc ETF

CAJPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAJPY and SEKEY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAJPY and SEKEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAJPY
1D Price
Change %
CAJPY100%
+1.77%
SEKEY - CAJPY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
STX - CAJPY
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
NTAP - CAJPY
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
ANET - CAJPY
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
NNDM - CAJPY
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More

NTAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTAP has been closely correlated with PSTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTAP jumps, then PSTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTAP
1D Price
Change %
NTAP100%
-0.07%
PSTG - NTAP
73%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
DELL - NTAP
68%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
HPQ - NTAP
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
WDC - NTAP
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
FFIV - NTAP
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More