Advertisement
CAJPY vs NNDM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAJPY is a Hold and NNDM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAJPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNNDM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CAJPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NNDM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAJPY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNDM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAJPY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
- NNDM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CAJPY (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while NNDM (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -4.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAJPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
NNDM is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-0.06% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| CAJPY | NNDM | CAJPY / NNDM | |
| Capitalization | 26.1B | 617M | 4,230% |
| EBITDA | 616B | -48.58M | -1,268,090% |
| Gain YTD | -9.288 | -41.935 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.06 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.15T | 56.3M | 7,362,345% |
| Total Cash | 545B | 852M | 63,967% |
| Total Debt | 663B | 13.8M | 4,804,348% |
CAJPY | NNDM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAJPY's Valuation (7) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NNDM (31) in the Textiles industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNDM (93) in the Textiles industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's SMR Rating (70) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NNDM (93) in the Textiles industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NNDM (89) in the Textiles industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNDM (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
| CAJPY | NNDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 53% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
CAJPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CAJPY and SEKEY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAJPY and SEKEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | 100% | -1.60% | ||
| SEKEY - CAJPY | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| STX - CAJPY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| NTAP - CAJPY | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ANET - CAJPY | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.57% | ||
| NNDM - CAJPY | 8% Poorly correlated | -7.69% | ||
More | ||||
NNDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNDM has been loosely correlated with SSYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNDM jumps, then SSYS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNDM | 100% | -7.69% | ||
| SSYS - NNDM | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| CRSR - NNDM | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.13% | ||
| RGTI - NNDM | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.79% | ||
| DDD - NNDM | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
| SMCI - NNDM | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.15% | ||
More | ||||