Advertisement
CAJFF vs HAUP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAJFF is a Hold and HAUP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAJFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHAUP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CAJFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HAUP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
CAJFF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HAUP (@Computer Peripherals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.11%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (+0.38% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| CAJFF | HAUP | CAJFF / HAUP | |
| Capitalization | 26.1B | 709K | 3,681,241% |
| EBITDA | 616B | -1.82M | -33,898,902% |
| Gain YTD | -0.274 | -6.154 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.29 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.15T | 24M | 17,270,833% |
| Total Cash | 545B | 1.46M | 37,303,217% |
| Total Debt | 663B | N/A | - |
CAJFF | HAUP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAJFF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as HAUP (29). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew similarly to HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAUP (100). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as HAUP (100). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew similarly to HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAUP (79). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
CAJFF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAUP (100). This means that CAJFF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAUP’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
CAJFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CAJFF and DRSHF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAJFF and DRSHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAJFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DRSHF - CAJFF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| CAN - CAJFF | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.72% | ||
| HAUP - CAJFF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QMCO - CAJFF | 3% Poorly correlated | +14.03% | ||
| EBON - CAJFF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||
HAUP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HAUP and QMCO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAUP and QMCO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAUP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAUP | 100% | N/A | ||
| QMCO - HAUP | 25% Poorly correlated | +14.03% | ||
| CREAF - HAUP | 6% Poorly correlated | +7.02% | ||
| CAJFF - HAUP | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACEYY - HAUP | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DRSHF - HAUP | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||