CAIB
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
18.75M
NEFB
Price
$320.00
Change
-$4.00 (-1.23%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
40.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAIB vs NEFB

Header iconCAIB vs NEFB Comparison
Open Charts CAIB vs NEFBBanner chart's image
California International Bank
Price$0.08
Change-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.75M
Neffs Ban
Price$320.00
Change-$4.00 (-1.23%)
Volume$8
Capitalization40.15M
CAIB vs NEFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAIB vs. NEFB commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAIB is a Hold and NEFB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CAIB: $0.08 vs. NEFB: $320.00)
Brand notoriety: CAIB and NEFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAIB: 19% vs. NEFB: 27%
Market capitalization -- CAIB: $18.75M vs. NEFB: $40.15M
CAIB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $18.75M. NEFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $40.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEFB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAIB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEFB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEFB is a better buy in the long-term than CAIB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAIB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEFB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAIB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NEFB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAIB is a better buy in the short-term than NEFB.

Price Growth

CAIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NEFB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEFB($40.1M) has a higher market cap than CAIB($18.7M). NEFB YTD gains are higher at: 54.449 vs. CAIB (-19.898).
CAIBNEFBCAIB / NEFB
Capitalization18.7M40.1M47%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.89854.449-37%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A8.98M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.73M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAIB vs NEFB: Fundamental Ratings
CAIB
NEFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
8971
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
504
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEFB's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAIB (91). This means that NEFB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

NEFB's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIB (100). This means that NEFB’s stock grew similarly to CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

NEFB's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIB (89). This means that NEFB’s stock grew similarly to CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

NEFB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIB (60). This means that NEFB’s stock grew similarly to CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

NEFB's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAIB (50). This means that NEFB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAIBNEFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARCXF0.06N/A
N/A
ArcelorMittal South Africa
CMPD3.52N/A
N/A
CompuMed, Inc.
KUMBF19.90N/A
N/A
Kumba Iron Ore Ltd.
ASHTY264.77-0.34
-0.13%
Ashtead Group PLC
VRNOF0.49-0.01
-2.78%
Verano Holdings Corp.

CAIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAIB has been loosely correlated with CIHHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAIB jumps, then CIHHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAIB
1D Price
Change %
CAIB100%
N/A
CIHHF - CAIB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKALF - CAIB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEFB - CAIB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMHG - CAIB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIWV - CAIB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NEFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEFB and RGNLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEFB and RGNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEFB
1D Price
Change %
NEFB100%
N/A
RGNLF - NEFB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAIB - NEFB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CITZ - NEFB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
KGTFF - NEFB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRDBY - NEFB
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More