CAIB
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
10.4M
CIHHF
Price
$6.30
Change
+$0.50 (+8.62%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
144.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAIB vs CIHHF

Header iconCAIB vs CIHHF Comparison
Open Charts CAIB vs CIHHFBanner chart's image
California International Bank
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization10.4M
China Merchants Bank
Price$6.30
Change+$0.50 (+8.62%)
Volume$200
Capitalization144.89B
CAIB vs CIHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAIB vs. CIHHF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAIB is a Hold and CIHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CAIB: $0.06 vs. CIHHF: $6.30)
Brand notoriety: CAIB and CIHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAIB: 757% vs. CIHHF: 8%
Market capitalization -- CAIB: $10.4M vs. CIHHF: $144.89B
CAIB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.4M. CIHHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $144.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIHHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAIB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CIHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIHHF is a better buy in the long-term than CAIB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAIB’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIHHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAIB’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CIHHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CAIB and CIHHF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CAIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.44% price change this week, while CIHHF (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHHF($145B) has a higher market cap than CAIB($10.4M). CAIB has higher P/E ratio than CIHHF: CAIB (75.00) vs CIHHF (7.94). CIHHF YTD gains are higher at: 34.328 vs. CAIB (-37.755). CIHHF has higher revenues than CAIB: CIHHF (332B) vs CAIB (3.93M).
CAIBCIHHFCAIB / CIHHF
Capitalization10.4M145B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-37.75534.328-110%
P/E Ratio75.007.94945%
Revenue3.93M332B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A433B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAIB vs CIHHF: Fundamental Ratings
CAIB
CIHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIHHF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAIB (95). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIB (100). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAIB (92). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAIB (89). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIB (40). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to CAIB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAIBCIHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMGXF0.36N/A
N/A
AnGes MG Inc.
NEWEN95.55N/A
N/A
New England Power Co.
IMYSY5.50N/A
N/A
IMERYS SA
LVXFF0.26N/A
N/A
Leviathan Gold Ltd.
BZLFY15.80-0.06
-0.38%
Bunzl plc

CAIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAIB has been loosely correlated with CIHHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAIB jumps, then CIHHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAIB
1D Price
Change %
CAIB100%
N/A
CIHHF - CAIB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKALF - CAIB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEFB - CAIB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMHG - CAIB
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
CIWV - CAIB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CIHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHHF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHHF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHHF
1D Price
Change %
CIHHF100%
N/A
CAIB - CIHHF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIWV - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHKY - CIHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
MTPOF - CIHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBGOF - CIHHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More