CAIAF
Price
$28.00
Change
-$4.17 (-12.96%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
3.45B
CLNXF
Price
$38.77
Change
+$0.27 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
28.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAIAF vs CLNXF

Header iconCAIAF vs CLNXF Comparison
Open Charts CAIAF vs CLNXFBanner chart's image
CA Immobilien Anlagen AG
Price$28.00
Change-$4.17 (-12.96%)
Volume$4.25K
Capitalization3.45B
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$38.77
Change+$0.27 (+0.70%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization28.88B
CAIAF vs CLNXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAIAF vs. CLNXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAIAF is a Hold and CLNXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CAIAF: $28.00 vs. CLNXF: $38.77)
Brand notoriety: CAIAF and CLNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAIAF: 915% vs. CLNXF: 322%
Market capitalization -- CAIAF: $3.45B vs. CLNXF: $28.88B
CAIAF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $3.45B. CLNXF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $28.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAIAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLNXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAIAF is a better buy in the long-term than CLNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAIAF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLNXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAIAF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLNXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLNXF is a better buy in the short-term than CAIAF.

Price Growth

CAIAF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -12.96% price change this week, while CLNXF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLNXF($28.9B) has a higher market cap than CAIAF($3.45B). CLNXF YTD gains are higher at: 19.864 vs. CAIAF (-12.962). CLNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.67B vs. CAIAF (-239.89M). CAIAF has more cash in the bank: 739M vs. CLNXF (243M). CAIAF has less debt than CLNXF: CAIAF (2.67B) vs CLNXF (21.1B). CLNXF has higher revenues than CAIAF: CLNXF (3.54B) vs CAIAF (420M).
CAIAFCLNXFCAIAF / CLNXF
Capitalization3.45B28.9B12%
EBITDA-239.89M2.67B-9%
Gain YTD-12.96219.864-65%
P/E Ratio30.30N/A-
Revenue420M3.54B12%
Total Cash739M243M304%
Total Debt2.67B21.1B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAIAF vs CLNXF: Fundamental Ratings
CAIAF
CLNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAIAF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLNXF (99). This means that CAIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CAIAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNXF (100). This means that CAIAF’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLNXF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIAF (91). This means that CLNXF’s stock grew similarly to CAIAF’s over the last 12 months.

CLNXF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIAF (83). This means that CLNXF’s stock grew similarly to CAIAF’s over the last 12 months.

CAIAF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNXF (16). This means that CAIAF’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAIAFCLNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XMTR34.491.82
+5.57%
Xometry
IT400.284.84
+1.22%
Gartner
ACLS73.040.09
+0.12%
Axcelis Technologies
LFCR8.04N/A
N/A
Lifecore Biomedical
CHEK0.74-0.01
-1.62%
Check-Cap Ltd

CAIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAIAF and STHO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAIAF and STHO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAIAF
1D Price
Change %
CAIAF100%
N/A
STHO - CAIAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
CWK - CAIAF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
NMRK - CAIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
IFSUF - CAIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSV - CAIAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More

CLNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNXF has been loosely correlated with VONOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNXF jumps, then VONOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNXF
1D Price
Change %
CLNXF100%
N/A
VONOY - CLNXF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
VNNVF - CLNXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAIAF - CLNXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBJF - CLNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUHJY - CLNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More