CAHPF
Price
$4.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.63B
XTGRF
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.03 (-1.99%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
29.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs XTGRF

Header iconCAHPF vs XTGRF Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs XTGRFBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$4.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.79K
Capitalization4.63B
Xtra-Gold Resources
Price$1.48
Change-$0.03 (-1.99%)
Volume$210
Capitalization29.78M
CAHPF vs XTGRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XTGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. XTGRF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Hold and XTGRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $4.94 vs. XTGRF: $1.48)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and XTGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 30% vs. XTGRF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $4.63B vs. XTGRF: $29.78M
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.63B. XTGRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXTGRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XTGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, XTGRF is a better buy in the long-term than CAHPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XTGRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XTGRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XTGRF is a better buy in the short-term than CAHPF.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.06% price change this week, while XTGRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($4.63B) has a higher market cap than XTGRF($29.8M). XTGRF has higher P/E ratio than CAHPF: XTGRF (63.29) vs CAHPF (20.75). CAHPF YTD gains are higher at: 65.938 vs. XTGRF (9.637). CAHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02B vs. XTGRF (-1.51M). CAHPF has more cash in the bank: 373M vs. XTGRF (10.5M). CAHPF has higher revenues than XTGRF: CAHPF (2.34B) vs XTGRF (0).
CAHPFXTGRFCAHPF / XTGRF
Capitalization4.63B29.8M15,544%
EBITDA1.02B-1.51M-67,566%
Gain YTD65.9389.637684%
P/E Ratio20.7563.2933%
Revenue2.34B0-
Total Cash373M10.5M3,552%
Total Debt605MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF vs XTGRF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
XTGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7525
SMR RATING
1..100
9342
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAHPF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XTGRF (77). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAHPF (75). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

XTGRF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAHPF (93). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as XTGRF (47). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as XTGRF (100). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFXTGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XTGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDRL0.030.01
+28.15%
Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.
IFCZF228.211.10
+0.48%
Intact Financial Corp.
ELSSF24.17N/A
N/A
ELIS
FTFI29.00N/A
N/A
First Berlin Bancorp, Inc.
IFSPF9.21-0.26
-2.72%
Interfor Corporation

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
-0.07%
CNL - CAHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.76%
DGMLF - CAHPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XTGRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
JINFF - CAHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
PMNXF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More