CAHPF
Price
$6.30
Change
+$0.05 (+0.80%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.87B
WGXRF
Price
$2.48
Change
+$0.10 (+4.20%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs WGXRF

Header iconCAHPF vs WGXRF Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs WGXRFBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$6.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.80%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization11.87B
Westgold Resources
Price$2.48
Change+$0.10 (+4.20%)
Volume$225.73K
Capitalization2.3B
CAHPF vs WGXRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGXRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. WGXRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Buy and WGXRF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $6.30 vs. WGXRF: $2.48)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and WGXRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 26% vs. WGXRF: 244%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $11.87B vs. WGXRF: $2.3B
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $11.87B. WGXRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWGXRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WGXRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the long-term than WGXRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGXRF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WGXRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CAHPF and WGXRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +15.38% price change this week, while WGXRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($11.9B) has a higher market cap than WGXRF($2.3B). WGXRF has higher P/E ratio than CAHPF: WGXRF (99.47) vs CAHPF (20.74). CAHPF YTD gains are higher at: 111.772 vs. WGXRF (41.722).
CAHPFWGXRFCAHPF / WGXRF
Capitalization11.9B2.3B518%
EBITDA1.93BN/A-
Gain YTD111.77241.722268%
P/E Ratio20.7499.4721%
Revenue4.01BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF vs WGXRF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
WGXRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7726
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
332
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAHPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WGXRF (80). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew significantly faster than WGXRF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WGXRF (100). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WGXRF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as WGXRF (100). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to WGXRF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as WGXRF (38). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to WGXRF’s over the last 12 months.

WGXRF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CAHPF (33). This means that WGXRF’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFWGXRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGXRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSVLX20.03N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Fintech Port
INFCX14.50N/A
N/A
Kotak India Equity Fund Class C
TRAIX37.93N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation I
STREX22.55N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Equity Income R6
FSTUX28.34-0.14
-0.49%
Invesco Dividend Income Investor

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
+0.80%
CNL - CAHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.42%
XTGRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
PMNXF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
LGDTF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
FFMGF - CAHPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
More

WGXRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WGXRF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WGXRF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGXRF
1D Price
Change %
WGXRF100%
+4.20%
CRNLF - WGXRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
LVGLF - WGXRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.62%
CAHPF - WGXRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
STLRF - WGXRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.37%
BDLNF - WGXRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More