CAHPF
Price
$6.12
Change
+$0.07 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.81B
PMNXF
Price
$2.69
Change
+$0.01 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs PMNXF

Header iconCAHPF vs PMNXF Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs PMNXFBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$6.12
Change+$0.07 (+1.16%)
Volume$13.59K
Capitalization11.81B
Perseus Mining
Price$2.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.37%)
Volume$32.89K
Capitalization3.61B
CAHPF vs PMNXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. PMNXF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Buy and PMNXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $6.25 vs. PMNXF: $2.69)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and PMNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 17% vs. PMNXF: 371%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $11.81B vs. PMNXF: $3.61B
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $11.81B. PMNXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMNXF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMNXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMNXF is a better buy in the long-term than CAHPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMNXF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PMNXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMNXF is a better buy in the short-term than CAHPF.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.22% price change this week, while PMNXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4895.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.22% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($11.8B) has a higher market cap than PMNXF($3.61B). CAHPF has higher P/E ratio than PMNXF: CAHPF (20.66) vs PMNXF (9.84). CAHPF YTD gains are higher at: 105.553 vs. PMNXF (72.628).
CAHPFPMNXFCAHPF / PMNXF
Capitalization11.8B3.61B327%
EBITDA1.93BN/A-
Gain YTD105.55372.628145%
P/E Ratio20.669.84210%
Revenue4.01BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF vs PMNXF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
PMNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6214
SMR RATING
1..100
9243
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4418
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5019

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAHPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as PMNXF (15). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to PMNXF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAHPF (62). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAHPF (92). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PMNXF (40). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to PMNXF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CAHPF (44). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFPMNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BURGER.X0.0026230.000040
+1.53%
BurgerCities cryptocurrency
OP.X0.7187660.008910
+1.26%
Optimism cryptocurrency
YFI.X5327.38670039.580080
+0.75%
yearn.finance cryptocurrency
XEM.X0.0023720.000011
+0.46%
NEM cryptocurrency
EDU.X0.131654-0.000417
-0.32%
Open Campus cryptocurrency

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
+1.24%
CNL - CAHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
XTGRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
PMNXF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
LGDTF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
FFMGF - CAHPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
More

PMNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMNXF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMNXF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMNXF
1D Price
Change %
PMNXF100%
+0.49%
TORXF - PMNXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
BTG - PMNXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
AEM - PMNXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
NESRF - PMNXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
GPTRF - PMNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
More