CAHPF
Price
$4.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.63B
JINFF
Price
$9.08
Change
+$0.26 (+2.95%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs JINFF

Header iconCAHPF vs JINFF Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs JINFFBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$4.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.79K
Capitalization4.63B
China Gold International Resources
Price$9.08
Change+$0.26 (+2.95%)
Volume$5.05K
Capitalization1.58B
CAHPF vs JINFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JINFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. JINFF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Hold and JINFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $4.94 vs. JINFF: $9.08)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and JINFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 30% vs. JINFF: 85%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $4.63B vs. JINFF: $1.58B
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.63B. JINFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJINFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JINFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JINFF is a better buy in the long-term than CAHPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JINFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JINFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JINFF is a better buy in the short-term than CAHPF.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.06% price change this week, while JINFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

JINFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($4.63B) has a higher market cap than JINFF($1.58B). CAHPF has higher P/E ratio than JINFF: CAHPF (20.75) vs JINFF (6.92). JINFF YTD gains are higher at: 76.732 vs. CAHPF (65.938). CAHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02B vs. JINFF (303M). JINFF has more cash in the bank: 553M vs. CAHPF (373M). CAHPF has less debt than JINFF: CAHPF (605M) vs JINFF (845M). CAHPF has higher revenues than JINFF: CAHPF (2.34B) vs JINFF (1.05B).
CAHPFJINFFCAHPF / JINFF
Capitalization4.63B1.58B293%
EBITDA1.02B303M336%
Gain YTD65.93876.73286%
P/E Ratio20.756.92300%
Revenue2.34B1.05B222%
Total Cash373M553M67%
Total Debt605M845M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF vs JINFF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
JINFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7511
SMR RATING
1..100
9369
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9495
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAHPF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as JINFF (18). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to JINFF’s over the last 12 months.

JINFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAHPF (75). This means that JINFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

JINFF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CAHPF (93). This means that JINFF’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

JINFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CAHPF (40). This means that JINFF’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as JINFF (95). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to JINFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFJINFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JINFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNSE35.800.71
+2.02%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF
DJD52.780.47
+0.90%
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF
TSPA38.710.22
+0.57%
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
UPSD24.450.13
+0.52%
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
FDIF33.450.14
+0.41%
Fidelity Disruptors ETF

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
-0.07%
CNL - CAHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.76%
DGMLF - CAHPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XTGRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
JINFF - CAHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
PMNXF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

JINFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JINFF and ZIJMF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JINFF and ZIJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JINFF
1D Price
Change %
JINFF100%
+2.95%
ZIJMF - JINFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
CGLCF - JINFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
CAHPF - JINFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
CHPGF - JINFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-11.26%
SMAGF - JINFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
More