CAHPF
Price
$6.92
Change
+$0.23 (+3.43%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.66B
FFMGF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
261.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs FFMGF

Header iconCAHPF vs FFMGF Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs FFMGFBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$6.92
Change+$0.23 (+3.43%)
Volume$5.67K
Capitalization13.66B
First Mining Gold
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$992.78K
Capitalization261.14M
CAHPF vs FFMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. FFMGF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a Buy and FFMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $6.93 vs. FFMGF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and FFMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 96% vs. FFMGF: 68%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $13.66B vs. FFMGF: $261.14M
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.66B. FFMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $261.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the long-term than FFMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFMGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFMGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the short-term than FFMGF.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.15% price change this week, while FFMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than FFMGF($261M). FFMGF YTD gains are higher at: 144.743 vs. CAHPF (132.781). CAHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. FFMGF (-7.68M). CAHPF has higher revenues than FFMGF: CAHPF (4.01B) vs FFMGF (0).
CAHPFFFMGFCAHPF / FFMGF
Capitalization13.7B261M5,249%
EBITDA1.93B-7.68M-25,133%
Gain YTD132.781144.74392%
P/E Ratio22.61N/A-
Revenue4.01B0-
Total CashN/A5.78M-
Total DebtN/A210K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF vs FFMGF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
FFMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1919
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
9293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAHPF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMGF (36). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to FFMGF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMGF (100). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMGF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMGF (93). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew similarly to FFMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CAHPF (37). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to CAHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CAHPF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMGF (100). This means that CAHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFFFMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIONX17.18N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI International Index
NSRKX26.09-0.11
-0.42%
Northern World Selection Index K
EGORX20.70-0.09
-0.43%
Allspring Large Cap Core R6
FRMCX25.46-0.25
-0.97%
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val A
ISGDX15.04-0.16
-1.05%
Columbia Integrated Small Cap Gr A

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
+3.36%
CNL - CAHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
XTGRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
PMNXF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
LGDTF - CAHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
FFMGF - CAHPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

FFMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMGF and BCEKF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMGF and BCEKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMGF
1D Price
Change %
FFMGF100%
-1.37%
BCEKF - FFMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+9.02%
TORXF - FFMGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
TDRRF - FFMGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.77%
ORZCF - FFMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
KNTNF - FFMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.62%
More