CAHPF
Price
$7.60
Change
-$0.05 (-0.65%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
15.73B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNL
Price
$10.27
Change
-$0.68 (-6.21%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
957.98M
132 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAHPF vs CNL

Header iconCAHPF vs CNL Comparison
Open Charts CAHPF vs CNLBanner chart's image
Evolution Mining
Price$7.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.93K
Capitalization15.73B
COLLECTIVE MINING
Price$10.27
Change-$0.68 (-6.21%)
Volume$28.91K
Capitalization957.98M
CAHPF vs CNL Comparison Chart in %
CAHPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAHPF vs. CNL commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAHPF is a StrongBuy and CNL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CAHPF: $7.60 vs. CNL: $10.27)
Brand notoriety: CAHPF and CNL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAHPF: 30% vs. CNL: 43%
Market capitalization -- CAHPF: $15.73B vs. CNL: $957.98M
CAHPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.73B. CNL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $957.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAHPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAHPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the long-term than CNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAHPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAHPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAHPF is a better buy in the short-term than CNL.

Price Growth

CAHPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +11.93% price change this week, while CNL (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8543.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNL is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.93% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAHPF($15.7B) has a higher market cap than CNL($958M). CAHPF YTD gains are higher at: 155.471 vs. CNL (146.875). CAHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. CNL (-40.63M). CAHPF has higher revenues than CNL: CAHPF (4.01B) vs CNL (0).
CAHPFCNLCAHPF / CNL
Capitalization15.7B958M1,639%
EBITDA1.93B-40.63M-4,753%
Gain YTD155.471146.875106%
P/E Ratio25.06N/A-
Revenue4.01B0-
Total CashN/A70.6M-
Total DebtN/A1.18M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAHPF: Fundamental Ratings
CAHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
12

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHPFCNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAHPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BME40.34-0.06
-0.15%
Blackrock Health Sciences Trust
IDV38.41-0.15
-0.39%
iShares International Select Div ETF
IAUG28.07-0.11
-0.39%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Aug
BAMG39.24-0.79
-1.99%
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
TSLP22.21-1.61
-6.74%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Tesla ETF

CAHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAHPF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAHPF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAHPF
1D Price
Change %
CAHPF100%
-0.65%
CNL - CAHPF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.21%
NEM - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
PAAS - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
WGXRF - CAHPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
OR - CAHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
More

CNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNL has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNL jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNL
1D Price
Change %
CNL100%
-6.21%
AEM - CNL
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
WPM - CNL
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
CGAU - CNL
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
FNV - CNL
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
ARMN - CNL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More