CAH
Price
$157.14
Change
-$1.14 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
27.26B
16 days until earnings call
OMI
Price
$7.88
Change
-$0.06 (-0.76%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.11B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAH vs OMI

Header iconCAH vs OMI Comparison
Open Charts CAH vs OMIBanner chart's image
Cardinal Health
Price$157.14
Change-$1.14 (-0.72%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization27.26B
Owens & Minor
Price$7.88
Change-$0.06 (-0.76%)
Volume$546.1K
Capitalization2.11B
CAH vs OMI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAH vs. OMI commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAH is a Hold and OMI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CAH: $157.14 vs. OMI: $7.88)
Brand notoriety: CAH and OMI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAH: 63% vs. OMI: 44%
Market capitalization -- CAH: $27.26B vs. OMI: $2.11B
CAH [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $27.26B. OMI’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $2.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $70.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAH is a better buy in the long-term than OMI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAH is a better buy in the short-term than OMI.

Price Growth

CAH (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while OMI (@Medical Distributors) price change was +1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAH is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

OMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (+3.49% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAH($27.3B) has a higher market cap than OMI($2.11B). OMI has higher P/E ratio than CAH: OMI (64.10) vs CAH (44.47). CAH YTD gains are higher at: 34.336 vs. OMI (-39.709). CAH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.89B vs. OMI (391M). CAH has more cash in the bank: 4.59B vs. OMI (243M). OMI has less debt than CAH: OMI (2.32B) vs CAH (4.72B). CAH has higher revenues than OMI: CAH (216B) vs OMI (10.3B).
CAHOMICAH / OMI
Capitalization27.3B2.11B1,296%
EBITDA1.89B391M484%
Gain YTD34.336-39.709-86%
P/E Ratio44.4764.1069%
Revenue216B10.3B2,097%
Total Cash4.59B243M1,889%
Total Debt4.72B2.32B204%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAH vs OMI: Fundamental Ratings
CAH
OMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6277
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
297
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5016

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMI's Valuation (57) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as CAH (63). This means that OMI’s stock grew similarly to CAH’s over the last 12 months.

CAH's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Medical Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMI (97). This means that CAH’s stock grew significantly faster than OMI’s over the last 12 months.

OMI's SMR Rating (97) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as CAH (99). This means that OMI’s stock grew similarly to CAH’s over the last 12 months.

CAH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as OMI (64). This means that CAH’s stock grew similarly to OMI’s over the last 12 months.

OMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Medical Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAH (92). This means that OMI’s stock grew significantly faster than CAH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHOMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTN10.190.06
+0.59%
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals
VOOV193.700.57
+0.30%
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
BSMY23.470.03
+0.13%
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Muncpl Bd ETF
ROMO32.56-0.03
-0.08%
Strategy Shares Nwfnd/RSlv Rbt Mmt ETF
IXP113.19-0.49
-0.43%
iShares Global Comm Services ETF

CAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAH has been loosely correlated with COR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAH jumps, then COR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAH
1D Price
Change %
CAH100%
-0.72%
COR - CAH
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
MCK - CAH
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
OMI - CAH
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
YI - CAH
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
EDAP - CAH
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
More

OMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMI and CAH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMI and CAH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMI
1D Price
Change %
OMI100%
-0.76%
CAH - OMI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
HSIC - OMI
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZYXI - OMI
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
EDAP - OMI
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
COR - OMI
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More