CAH
Price
$149.56
Change
+$0.22 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
35.71B
53 days until earnings call
EDAP
Price
$2.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
94.23M
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAH vs EDAP

Header iconCAH vs EDAP Comparison
Open Charts CAH vs EDAPBanner chart's image
Cardinal Health
Price$149.56
Change+$0.22 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.72M
Capitalization35.71B
EDAP TMS SA
Price$2.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$134.63K
Capitalization94.23M
CAH vs EDAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAH vs. EDAP commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAH is a Buy and EDAP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CAH: $149.56 vs. EDAP: $2.52)
Brand notoriety: CAH and EDAP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAH: 79% vs. EDAP: 124%
Market capitalization -- CAH: $35.71B vs. EDAP: $94.23M
CAH [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $35.71B. EDAP’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $94.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $85.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEDAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EDAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAH is a better buy in the long-term than EDAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EDAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAH is a better buy in the short-term than EDAP.

Price Growth

CAH (@Medical Distributors) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while EDAP (@Medical Distributors) price change was +11.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAH is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

EDAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (-0.96% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAH($35.7B) has a higher market cap than EDAP($94.2M). CAH YTD gains are higher at: 27.856 vs. EDAP (14.027). CAH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.11B vs. EDAP (-19.67M). CAH has more cash in the bank: 3.87B vs. EDAP (22.8M). EDAP has less debt than CAH: EDAP (9.08M) vs CAH (8.53B). CAH has higher revenues than EDAP: CAH (223B) vs EDAP (62.8M).
CAHEDAPCAH / EDAP
Capitalization35.7B94.2M37,898%
EBITDA3.11B-19.67M-15,788%
Gain YTD27.85614.027199%
P/E Ratio23.19N/A-
Revenue223B62.8M355,096%
Total Cash3.87B22.8M16,991%
Total Debt8.53B9.08M93,930%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAH vs EDAP: Fundamental Ratings
CAH
EDAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAH's Valuation (64) in the Medical Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDAP (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

CAH's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Medical Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew significantly faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

EDAP's SMR Rating (98) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CAH (99) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that EDAP’s stock grew similarly to CAH’s over the last 12 months.

EDAP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CAH (52) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that EDAP’s stock grew similarly to CAH’s over the last 12 months.

CAH's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAHEDAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KPTCY8.61N/A
N/A
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
CHSTF0.14N/A
N/A
China High Speed Transmission Equipment Group Co., Ltd.
MCLE0.15N/A
N/A
MEDICALE CORP.
AQUC12.10N/A
N/A
Aquaron Acquisition Corp.
CMSQY24.40-0.07
-0.29%
Computershare Ltd.

CAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAH has been loosely correlated with MCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAH jumps, then MCK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAH
1D Price
Change %
CAH100%
+0.15%
MCK - CAH
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
COR - CAH
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
EDAP - CAH
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSM - CAH
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
HSIC - CAH
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
More

EDAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDAP and COSM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDAP and COSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDAP
1D Price
Change %
EDAP100%
N/A
COSM - EDAP
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
ZYXI - EDAP
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YI - EDAP
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
COR - EDAP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
OMI - EDAP
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.07%
More