CAG
Price
$27.45
Change
-$0.19 (-0.69%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
48 days until earnings call
UTZ
Price
$16.87
Change
+$0.30 (+1.81%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
104 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CAG vs UTZ

Header iconCAG vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts CAG vs UTZBanner chart's image
Conagra Brands
Price$27.45
Change-$0.19 (-0.69%)
Volume$5.64M
CapitalizationN/A
Utz Brands
Price$16.87
Change+$0.30 (+1.81%)
Volume$792.32K
CapitalizationN/A
CAG vs UTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAG vs. UTZ commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a Hold and UTZ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CAG: $27.45 vs. UTZ: $16.87)
Brand notoriety: CAG and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAG: 115% vs. UTZ: 120%
Market capitalization -- CAG: $14.17B vs. UTZ: $1.5B
CAG [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.17B. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAG is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAG is a better buy in the short-term than UTZ.

Price Growth

CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -3.04% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAG is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.62% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAG($14.2B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.5B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than CAG: UTZ (81.45) vs CAG (14.48). UTZ YTD gains are higher at: 4.995 vs. CAG (0.366). CAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. UTZ (99.2M). CAG has more cash in the bank: 61.5M vs. UTZ (52M). UTZ has less debt than CAG: UTZ (985M) vs CAG (9.07B). CAG has higher revenues than UTZ: CAG (12.2B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
CAGUTZCAG / UTZ
Capitalization14.2B1.5B946%
EBITDA1.88B99.2M1,895%
Gain YTD0.3664.9957%
P/E Ratio14.4881.4518%
Revenue12.2B1.44B848%
Total Cash61.5M52M118%
Total Debt9.07B985M921%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAG vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
CAG
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6270
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6461
SMR RATING
1..100
8290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
655

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAG's Valuation (12) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (93) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CAG (64) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's SMR Rating (82) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as UTZ (90) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CAG (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (95) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAGUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAG
1D Price
Change %
CAG100%
-0.69%
GIS - CAG
72%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
CPB - CAG
67%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
FLO - CAG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
MDLZ - CAG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
KHC - CAG
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with POST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then POST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
+1.81%
POST - UTZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
FLO - UTZ
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
SMPL - UTZ
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
THS - UTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+5.35%
CAG - UTZ
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
More