CAG vs LANC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a StrongBuy and LANC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLANC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LANC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LANC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 03, 2024.
LANC is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.61% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CAG | LANC | CAG / LANC | |
| Capitalization | 14.2B | 5.67B | 250% |
| EBITDA | 1.88B | 244M | 770% |
| Gain YTD | 15.321 | 3.594 | 426% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.48 | 43.94 | 33% |
| Revenue | 12.2B | 1.87B | 653% |
| Total Cash | 61.5M | 134M | 46% |
| Total Debt | 9.07B | 13.3M | 68,195% |
CAG | LANC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAG's Valuation (15) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as CAG (52) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's SMR Rating (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as CAG (68) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (48) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (53) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.
| CAG | LANC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago 52% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
CAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
LANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANC | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| FLO - LANC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CAG - LANC | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| HAIN - LANC | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.06% | ||
| THS - LANC | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| INGR - LANC | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||