Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAFG vs XSMO
CAFG vs XSMO Comparison
Open Charts CAFG vs XSMO
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$24.12
Change+$0.22 (+0.92%)
Volume$100
Net Assets19.12M
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
Price$65.50
Change-$1.30 (-1.95%)
Volume$245.45K
Net Assets1.6B
CAFG vs XSMO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAFG vs. XSMO commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAFG is a Hold and XSMO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XSMO has more net assets: 1.6B vs. CAFG (19.1M). XSMO has a higher annual dividend yield than CAFG: XSMO (-0.608) vs CAFG (-5.956). CAFG was incepted earlier than XSMO: CAFG (2 years) vs XSMO (20 years). XSMO (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CAFG (0.59). CAFG has a higher turnover XSMO (107.00) vs XSMO (107.00).
| CAFG | XSMO | CAFG / XSMO | |
| Gain YTD | -5.956 | -0.608 | 979% |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 1.6B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.39 | 151% |
| Turnover | 152.00 | 107.00 | 142% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.83 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XSMO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CAFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAFG has been closely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAFG jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAFG | 100% | -1.86% | ||
| ZWS - CAFG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| EPAC - CAFG | 74% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| MHO - CAFG | 73% Closely correlated | -3.03% | ||
| CVCO - CAFG | 73% Closely correlated | -4.67% | ||
| FELE - CAFG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
More | ||||
XSMO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSMO has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSMO jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XSMO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSMO | 100% | -1.95% | ||
| PIPR - XSMO | 86% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| ABCB - XSMO | 83% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| MC - XSMO | 82% Closely correlated | -4.96% | ||
| ENVA - XSMO | 82% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| JXN - XSMO | 82% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||