Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAFG vs SLYG
CAFG vs SLYG Comparison
Open Charts CAFG vs SLYG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
Price$25.37
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$1.55K
Net Assets18.4M
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
Price$91.53
Change-$0.61 (-0.66%)
Volume$108.69K
Net Assets3.46B
CAFG vs SLYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAFG vs. SLYG commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAFG is a Hold and SLYG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLYG has more net assets: 3.46B vs. CAFG (18.4M). SLYG has a higher annual dividend yield than CAFG: SLYG (1.852) vs CAFG (-0.156). CAFG was incepted earlier than SLYG: CAFG (2 years) vs SLYG (25 years). SLYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CAFG (0.59). CAFG has a higher turnover SLYG (53.00) vs SLYG (53.00).
| CAFG | SLYG | CAFG / SLYG | |
| Gain YTD | -0.156 | 1.852 | -8% |
| Net Assets | 18.4M | 3.46B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 136.00 | 53.00 | 257% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 1.25 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CAFG | SLYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CAFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAFG has been closely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAFG jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAFG | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| CSW - CAFG | 72% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| MNRO - CAFG | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| PENG - CAFG | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| EPAC - CAFG | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| HSTM - CAFG | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.12% | ||
More | ||||
SLYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYG has been closely correlated with NPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYG jumps, then NPO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYG | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| NPO - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| MC - SLYG | 81% Closely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| SFBS - SLYG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| APAM - SLYG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CTS - SLYG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||