CACC
Price
$521.22
Change
+$9.10 (+1.78%)
Updated
Sep 3, 03:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.76B
61 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$61.48
Change
+$0.37 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.26B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CACC vs OMF

Header iconCACC vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts CACC vs OMFBanner chart's image
Credit Acceptance
Price$521.22
Change+$9.10 (+1.78%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.76B
OneMain Holdings
Price$61.48
Change+$0.37 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.17K
Capitalization7.26B
CACC vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CACC vs. OMF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a Buy and OMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CACC: $512.12 vs. OMF: $61.11)
Brand notoriety: CACC and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CACC: 61% vs. OMF: 61%
Market capitalization -- CACC: $5.76B vs. OMF: $7.26B
CACC [@Savings Banks] is valued at $5.76B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $7.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $679.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CACC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CACC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than CACC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CACC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CACC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CACC and OMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CACC (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CACC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.38% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.26B) has a higher market cap than CACC($5.76B). CACC has higher P/E ratio than OMF: CACC (14.79) vs OMF (11.01). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 24.239 vs. CACC (9.087). CACC has less debt than OMF: CACC (6.47B) vs OMF (22.1B). OMF has higher revenues than CACC: OMF (4.76B) vs CACC (2.24B).
CACCOMFCACC / OMF
Capitalization5.76B7.26B79%
EBITDA555MN/A-
Gain YTD9.08724.23937%
P/E Ratio14.7911.01134%
Revenue2.24B4.76B47%
Total Cash70MN/A-
Total Debt6.47B22.1B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CACC vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
CACC
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1817
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8819
SMR RATING
1..100
358
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9636
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (21) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (80). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CACC (88). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CACC (35). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CACC (53). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (96). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACCOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POSKX37.75-0.22
-0.58%
PRIMECAP Odyssey Stock
JSVUX28.79-0.18
-0.62%
JPMorgan Small Cap Value R6
RNPFX70.89-0.56
-0.78%
American Funds New Perspective R5
RTIYX12.11-0.11
-0.90%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq Y
NMVZX12.37-0.14
-1.12%
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-1.21%
ENVA - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
AXP - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
SYF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
COF - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
BFH - OMF
75%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
More