CACC
Price
$505.60
Change
+$31.07 (+6.55%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.79B
52 days until earnings call
MWG
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CACC vs MWG

Header iconCACC vs MWG Comparison
Open Charts CACC vs MWGBanner chart's image
Credit Acceptance
Price$505.60
Change+$31.07 (+6.55%)
Volume$162.8K
Capitalization6.79B
Multi Ways Holdings
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.82K
Capitalization9.74M
CACC vs MWG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CACC vs. MWG commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a StrongBuy and MWG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CACC: $493.02 vs. MWG: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: CACC and MWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CACC: 101% vs. MWG: 86%
Market capitalization -- CACC: $6.79B vs. MWG: $9.74M
CACC [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.79B. MWG’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $9.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CACC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMWG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CACC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MWG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CACC is a better buy in the long-term than MWG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CACC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MWG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CACC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MWG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CACC is a better buy in the short-term than MWG.

Price Growth

CACC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while MWG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CACC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CACC($6.79B) has a higher market cap than MWG($9.74M). CACC has higher P/E ratio than MWG: CACC (24.75) vs MWG (6.37). CACC YTD gains are higher at: 5.019 vs. MWG (2.678).
CACCMWGCACC / MWG
Capitalization6.79B9.74M69,657%
EBITDA374MN/A-
Gain YTD5.0192.678187%
P/E Ratio24.756.37388%
Revenue1.88BN/A-
Total Cash13.2MN/A-
Total Debt5.07BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CACC: Fundamental Ratings
CACC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACCMWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

CACC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CACC has been closely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CACC jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CACC
1D Price
Change %
CACC100%
-0.05%
OMF - CACC
66%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
ALLY - CACC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
ENVA - CACC
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
SYF - CACC
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
COF - CACC
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More

MWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MWG and DXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MWG and DXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWG
1D Price
Change %
MWG100%
+1.53%
DXF - MWG
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.06%
PFSI - MWG
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
WSC - MWG
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
CACC - MWG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
AIHS - MWG
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More