CACC
Price
$491.32
Change
+$15.56 (+3.27%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.52B
15 days until earnings call
FOA
Price
$21.44
Change
-$0.18 (-0.83%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
237.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CACC vs FOA

Header iconCACC vs FOA Comparison
Open Charts CACC vs FOABanner chart's image
Credit Acceptance
Price$491.32
Change+$15.56 (+3.27%)
Volume$118.74K
Capitalization5.52B
Finance of America Companies
Price$21.44
Change-$0.18 (-0.83%)
Volume$64.1K
Capitalization237.54M
CACC vs FOA Comparison Chart in %
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CACC vs. FOA commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a Hold and FOA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CACC: $491.32 vs. FOA: $21.44)
Brand notoriety: CACC and FOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CACC: 97% vs. FOA: 46%
Market capitalization -- CACC: $5.52B vs. FOA: $237.54M
CACC [@Savings Banks] is valued at $5.52B. FOA’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $237.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $663.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CACC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CACC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the long-term than CACC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CACC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CACC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FOA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CACC and FOA are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CACC (@Savings Banks) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while FOA (@Savings Banks) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CACC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.78% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CACC($5.52B) has a higher market cap than FOA($238M). CACC has higher P/E ratio than FOA: CACC (14.19) vs FOA (3.09). CACC YTD gains are higher at: 4.656 vs. FOA (-23.755). CACC has less debt than FOA: CACC (6.47B) vs FOA (29.5B). CACC has higher revenues than FOA: CACC (2.24B) vs FOA (454M).
CACCFOACACC / FOA
Capitalization5.52B238M2,320%
EBITDA555MN/A-
Gain YTD4.656-23.755-20%
P/E Ratio14.193.09459%
Revenue2.24B454M493%
Total Cash70MN/A-
Total Debt6.47B29.5B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CACC vs FOA: Fundamental Ratings
CACC
FOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
246
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6189
SMR RATING
1..100
3518
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
944
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOA's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (89) in the null industry. This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CACC (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to CACC’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CACC (58) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to CACC’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CACC (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACCFOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCMWY75.000.67
+0.90%
Swisscom AG
CBUMF0.72N/A
N/A
China National Buildings Material
MADGF5.59N/A
N/A
MADER GROUP LTD
BLUAF10.90N/A
N/A
BlueRiver Acquisition Corp.
PNXPF0.04-0.01
-12.08%
Planet Ventures Inc

CACC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CACC has been loosely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CACC jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CACC
1D Price
Change %
CACC100%
+3.27%
ALLY - CACC
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.56%
OMF - CACC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
SYF - CACC
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
AXP - CACC
58%
Loosely correlated
+7.27%
WSC - CACC
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.34%
More

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOA and YRD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOA and YRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
-0.83%
YRD - FOA
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
SOFI - FOA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
PRAA - FOA
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
CACC - FOA
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
AGM - FOA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More