CACC
Price
$520.73
Change
+$1.03 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.85B
59 days until earnings call
FCFS
Price
$150.83
Change
+$1.09 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.69B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CACC vs FCFS

Header iconCACC vs FCFS Comparison
Open Charts CACC vs FCFSBanner chart's image
Credit Acceptance
Price$520.73
Change+$1.03 (+0.20%)
Volume$93.45K
Capitalization5.85B
FirstCash Holdings
Price$150.83
Change+$1.09 (+0.73%)
Volume$147.64K
Capitalization6.69B
CACC vs FCFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CACC vs. FCFS commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a Buy and FCFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CACC: $520.73 vs. FCFS: $150.83)
Brand notoriety: CACC and FCFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CACC: 80% vs. FCFS: 46%
Market capitalization -- CACC: $5.85B vs. FCFS: $6.69B
CACC [@Savings Banks] is valued at $5.85B. FCFS’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CACC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CACC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the long-term than CACC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CACC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CACC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CACC is a better buy in the short-term than FCFS.

Price Growth

CACC (@Savings Banks) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while FCFS (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

CACC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($6.69B) has a higher market cap than CACC($5.85B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than CACC: FCFS (23.20) vs CACC (15.04). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 46.935 vs. CACC (10.921). FCFS has less debt than CACC: FCFS (2.02B) vs CACC (6.47B).
CACCFCFSCACC / FCFS
Capitalization5.85B6.69B87%
EBITDA555MN/A-
Gain YTD10.92146.93523%
P/E Ratio15.0423.2065%
Revenue2.24BN/A-
Total Cash70MN/A-
Total Debt6.47B2.02B320%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CACC vs FCFS: Fundamental Ratings
CACC
FCFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2319
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9610
SMR RATING
1..100
3557
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9548
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CACC's Valuation (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (93). This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CACC (96). This means that FCFS’s stock grew significantly faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

CACC's SMR Rating (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (57). This means that CACC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CACC (46). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to CACC’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (95). This means that FCFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACCFCFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGEBX82.250.85
+1.04%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
FOPPX62.490.54
+0.87%
Franklin Growth Opportunities R6
MRLSX19.900.16
+0.81%
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth I
CCERX29.290.19
+0.65%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core R
VCRQX14.450.04
+0.28%
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6

CACC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CACC has been closely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CACC jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CACC
1D Price
Change %
CACC100%
+0.20%
OMF - CACC
66%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
ALLY - CACC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
ENVA - CACC
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
SYF - CACC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
BFH - CACC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
More

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with CACC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then CACC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
+0.73%
CACC - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
ENVA - FCFS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
COF - FCFS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
SLM - FCFS
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
CTOS - FCFS
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More