CAC
Price
$40.56
Change
-$0.46 (-1.12%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
686.29M
58 days until earnings call
FSBW
Price
$42.20
Change
-$0.23 (-0.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
320.57M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAC vs FSBW

Header iconCAC vs FSBW Comparison
Open Charts CAC vs FSBWBanner chart's image
Camden National
Price$40.56
Change-$0.46 (-1.12%)
Volume$40.43K
Capitalization686.29M
FS Ban
Price$42.20
Change-$0.23 (-0.54%)
Volume$10.99K
Capitalization320.57M
CAC vs FSBW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAC vs. FSBW commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAC is a Hold and FSBW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CAC: $40.56 vs. FSBW: $42.20)
Brand notoriety: CAC and FSBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAC: 56% vs. FSBW: 72%
Market capitalization -- CAC: $686.29M vs. FSBW: $320.57M
CAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $686.29M. FSBW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $320.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSBW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the long-term than CAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSBW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FSBW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAC is a better buy in the short-term than FSBW.

Price Growth

CAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while FSBW (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAC($686M) has a higher market cap than FSBW($321M). CAC has higher P/E ratio than FSBW: CAC (12.84) vs FSBW (10.17). FSBW YTD gains are higher at: 5.559 vs. CAC (-2.130). CAC has more cash in the bank: 84.5M vs. FSBW (15.2M). FSBW has less debt than CAC: FSBW (292M) vs CAC (420M).
CACFSBWCAC / FSBW
Capitalization686M321M214%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.1305.559-38%
P/E Ratio12.8410.17126%
Revenue209MN/A-
Total Cash84.5M15.2M556%
Total Debt420M292M144%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAC vs FSBW: Fundamental Ratings
CAC
FSBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7933
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5723
SMR RATING
1..100
3537
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (38). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAC (57). This means that FSBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (37). This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (51). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (52). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACFSBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBBI10.800.20
+1.89%
CBB Bancorp, Inc.
EGPLF0.11N/A
+0.82%
Eagle Plains Resources Ltd.
INGEF3.85N/A
N/A
Ingenia Communities Group
SHNWF5.33N/A
N/A
Schroders Plc.
RCRUY11.31-0.24
-2.08%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.

CAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAC
1D Price
Change %
CAC100%
-1.12%
UBSI - CAC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
TCBK - CAC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
BBT - CAC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
TRMK - CAC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
FCF - CAC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
More

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
-0.54%
AROW - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
MCBS - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
TCBK - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
FCBC - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
CAC - FSBW
77%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
More