CAC
Price
$44.78
Change
+$0.09 (+0.20%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
757.78M
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSBW
Price
$42.16
Change
-$0.07 (-0.17%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
316.98M
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAC vs FSBW

Header iconCAC vs FSBW Comparison
Open Charts CAC vs FSBWBanner chart's image
Camden National
Price$44.78
Change+$0.09 (+0.20%)
Volume$28.99K
Capitalization757.78M
FS Ban
Price$42.16
Change-$0.07 (-0.17%)
Volume$7.91K
Capitalization316.98M
CAC vs FSBW Comparison Chart in %
CAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAC vs. FSBW commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAC is a Hold and FSBW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CAC: $44.78 vs. FSBW: $42.16)
Brand notoriety: CAC and FSBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAC: 39% vs. FSBW: 54%
Market capitalization -- CAC: $757.78M vs. FSBW: $316.98M
CAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $757.78M. FSBW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $316.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSBW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the long-term than CAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSBW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSBW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAC is a better buy in the short-term than FSBW.

Price Growth

CAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.50% price change this week, while FSBW (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAC($758M) has a higher market cap than FSBW($317M). CAC has higher P/E ratio than FSBW: CAC (12.76) vs FSBW (10.31). CAC YTD gains are higher at: 9.248 vs. FSBW (6.242). CAC has more cash in the bank: 98.2M vs. FSBW (15.2M). FSBW has less debt than CAC: FSBW (186M) vs CAC (556M). CAC has higher revenues than FSBW: CAC (228M) vs FSBW (154M).
CACFSBWCAC / FSBW
Capitalization758M317M239%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.2486.242148%
P/E Ratio12.7610.31124%
Revenue228M154M148%
Total Cash98.2M15.2M646%
Total Debt556M186M299%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAC vs FSBW: Fundamental Ratings
CAC
FSBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
189
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5130
SMR RATING
1..100
3239
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5531
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (43). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (51). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (39). This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (51). This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (55). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACFSBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIXPF11.96N/A
N/A
Caixabank SA
JUTOF0.06N/A
N/A
Jutal Offshore Oil Service Ltd.
MNBEF20.54N/A
N/A
Minebea Mitsumi Inc.
KNFSF1.32N/A
N/A
Kiatnakin Phatra Bank Public Company Ltd.
IMUC0.12-0.06
-33.30%
EOM Pharmaceutical Holdings Inc.

CAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAC has been closely correlated with GABC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAC jumps, then GABC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAC
1D Price
Change %
CAC100%
+0.20%
GABC - CAC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
TCBK - CAC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
WSBC - CAC
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
SBSI - CAC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
IBOC - CAC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
More

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
-0.17%
CTBI - FSBW
74%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
BUSE - FSBW
74%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
MCBS - FSBW
73%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
CAC - FSBW
73%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
CNOB - FSBW
72%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
More