CABPF
Price
$0.68
Change
+$0.11 (+19.30%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
173.33M
EFGIF
Price
$20.00
Change
+$6.76 (+51.06%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CABPF vs EFGIF

Header iconCABPF vs EFGIF Comparison
Open Charts CABPF vs EFGIFBanner chart's image
CAB PMTS
Price$0.68
Change+$0.11 (+19.30%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization173.33M
EFG International AG
Price$20.00
Change+$6.76 (+51.06%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization6.06B
CABPF vs EFGIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CABPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CABPF vs. EFGIF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CABPF is a Hold and EFGIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CABPF: $0.68 vs. EFGIF: $20.00)
Brand notoriety: CABPF and EFGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CABPF: 109% vs. EFGIF: 194%
Market capitalization -- CABPF: $173.33M vs. EFGIF: $6.06B
CABPF [@Major Banks] is valued at $173.33M. EFGIF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $6.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $134.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CABPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEFGIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CABPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EFGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFGIF is a better buy in the long-term than CABPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CABPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFGIF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CABPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • EFGIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CABPF is a better buy in the short-term than EFGIF.

Price Growth

CABPF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EFGIF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFGIF($6.06B) has a higher market cap than CABPF($173M). CABPF has higher P/E ratio than EFGIF: CABPF (17.32) vs EFGIF (13.98). EFGIF YTD gains are higher at: 44.774 vs. CABPF (-22.857). CABPF has less debt than EFGIF: CABPF (18.5M) vs EFGIF (910M). EFGIF has higher revenues than CABPF: EFGIF (1.55B) vs CABPF (101M).
CABPFEFGIFCABPF / EFGIF
Capitalization173M6.06B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-22.85744.774-51%
P/E Ratio17.3213.98124%
Revenue101M1.55B6%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18.5M910M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFGIF: Fundamental Ratings
EFGIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
48
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CABPFEFGIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CABPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKX25.720.15
+0.59%
ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF
MDYV84.820.43
+0.51%
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
EWO30.540.03
+0.10%
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
QMMY24.13N/A
+0.01%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - May
QLVE27.92N/A
N/A
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF

CABPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CABPF and SMFNF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CABPF and SMFNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CABPF
1D Price
Change %
CABPF100%
N/A
SMFNF - CABPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
WEBNF - CABPF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
SVNLY - CABPF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
ANZGF - CABPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGY - CABPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More

EFGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFGIF and SMFNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFGIF and SMFNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFGIF
1D Price
Change %
EFGIF100%
N/A
SMFNF - EFGIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
ANZGY - EFGIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
SVNLF - EFGIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CABPF - EFGIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGF - EFGIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More