CABGY
Price
$25.55
Change
-$0.18 (-0.70%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
17.32B
3 days until earnings call
CRHKF
Price
$3.31
Change
-$0.40 (-10.78%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CABGY vs CRHKF

Header iconCABGY vs CRHKF Comparison
Open Charts CABGY vs CRHKFBanner chart's image
Carlsberg AS
Price$25.55
Change-$0.18 (-0.70%)
Volume$25.56K
Capitalization17.32B
China Resources Beer Holdings
Price$3.31
Change-$0.40 (-10.78%)
Volume$250
Capitalization10.76B
CABGY vs CRHKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CABGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRHKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CABGY vs. CRHKF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CABGY is a Hold and CRHKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CABGY: $25.55 vs. CRHKF: $3.31)
Brand notoriety: CABGY and CRHKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CABGY: 19% vs. CRHKF: 123%
Market capitalization -- CABGY: $17.32B vs. CRHKF: $10.76B
CABGY [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $17.32B. CRHKF’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $10.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $150.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $27.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CABGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRHKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CABGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRHKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKF is a better buy in the long-term than CABGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CABGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRHKF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CABGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CRHKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKF is a better buy in the short-term than CABGY.

Price Growth

CABGY (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while CRHKF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

CABGY is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+0.95% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CABGY($17.3B) has a higher market cap than CRHKF($10.8B). CRHKF (16.31) and CABGY (15.85) have similar P/E ratio . CABGY YTD gains are higher at: 38.088 vs. CRHKF (26.996).
CABGYCRHKFCABGY / CRHKF
Capitalization17.3B10.8B160%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.08826.996141%
P/E Ratio15.8516.3197%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CABGY vs CRHKF: Fundamental Ratings
CABGY
CRHKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
9854
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5233
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRHKF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CABGY (33). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to CABGY’s over the last 12 months.

CABGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKF (100). This means that CABGY’s stock grew similarly to CRHKF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CABGY (98). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CABGY’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CABGY (58). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to CABGY’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CABGY (52). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to CABGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CABGYCRHKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CABGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRHKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AYRO5.88-0.04
-0.68%
AYRO Inc
CACI494.89-5.05
-1.01%
Caci International CLA
BAND13.37-0.25
-1.84%
Bandwidth
STFS2.11-0.16
-7.05%
Star Fashion Culture Holdings Ltd
CIFR4.75-0.46
-8.83%
Cipher Mining

CABGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CABGY has been loosely correlated with CABJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CABGY jumps, then CABJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CABGY
1D Price
Change %
CABGY100%
-0.70%
CABJF - CABGY
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
KNBWF - CABGY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TBVPY - CABGY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HINKF - CABGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DVCMY - CABGY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More

CRHKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRHKF and SVIN have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRHKF and SVIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRHKF
1D Price
Change %
CRHKF100%
N/A
SVIN - CRHKF
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
DGEAF - CRHKF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
CRHKY - CRHKF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
CABGY - CRHKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
DVDCF - CRHKF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
More