CABA
Price
$2.42
Change
+$0.11 (+4.76%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
221.35M
49 days until earnings call
FBLG
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
22.03M
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CABA vs FBLG

Header iconCABA vs FBLG Comparison
Open Charts CABA vs FBLGBanner chart's image
Cabaletta Bio
Price$2.42
Change+$0.11 (+4.76%)
Volume$3.1M
Capitalization221.35M
FibroBiologics
Price$0.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$829.86K
Capitalization22.03M
CABA vs FBLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CABA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CABA vs. FBLG commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CABA is a Buy and FBLG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CABA: $2.42 vs. FBLG: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: CABA and FBLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CABA: 195% vs. FBLG: 178%
Market capitalization -- CABA: $221.35M vs. FBLG: $22.03M
CABA [@Biotechnology] is valued at $221.35M. FBLG’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $22.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $97.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CABA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CABA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CABA is a better buy in the long-term than FBLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CABA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBLG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CABA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FBLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CABA is a better buy in the short-term than FBLG.

Price Growth

CABA (@Biotechnology) experienced а +21.61% price change this week, while FBLG (@Biotechnology) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CABA is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

FBLG is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+2.75% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CABA($221M) has a higher market cap than FBLG($22M). CABA YTD gains are higher at: 6.608 vs. FBLG (-73.705). FBLG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.55M vs. CABA (-140.83M). CABA has more cash in the bank: 195M vs. FBLG (8.85M). FBLG has less debt than CABA: FBLG (10.8M) vs CABA (24.9M). CABA (0) and FBLG (0) have equivalent revenues.
CABAFBLGCABA / FBLG
Capitalization221M22M1,005%
EBITDA-140.83M-12.55M1,122%
Gain YTD6.608-73.705-9%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash195M8.85M2,205%
Total Debt24.9M10.8M231%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CABA: Fundamental Ratings
CABA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CABAFBLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CABA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CROX78.151.01
+1.31%
Crocs
GRMN237.391.01
+0.43%
Garmin Ltd
EJH1.07-0.02
-1.79%
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited
TOYO5.69-0.27
-4.53%
Toyo Co Ltd
BBOT11.24-0.84
-6.99%
BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc

CABA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CABA has been loosely correlated with IPSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CABA jumps, then IPSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CABA
1D Price
Change %
CABA100%
+4.76%
IPSC - CABA
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
GBIO - CABA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
ARWR - CABA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
ARCT - CABA
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.66%
KYTX - CABA
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.22%
More

FBLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBLG has been loosely correlated with XNCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FBLG jumps, then XNCR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBLG
1D Price
Change %
FBLG100%
-0.45%
XNCR - FBLG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
VYGR - FBLG
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
CCCC - FBLG
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
CABA - FBLG
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
IPSC - FBLG
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More