CAAS
Price
$4.68
Change
+$0.03 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:09 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
139.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$70.44
Change
+$0.63 (+0.90%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.68B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAAS vs PHIN

Header iconCAAS vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts CAAS vs PHINBanner chart's image
China Automotive Systems
Price$4.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization139.09M
PHINIA
Price$70.44
Change+$0.63 (+0.90%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.68B
CAAS vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
CAAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAAS vs. PHIN commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAAS is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CAAS: $4.65 vs. PHIN: $69.81)
Brand notoriety: CAAS and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAAS: 53% vs. PHIN: 107%
Market capitalization -- CAAS: $139.09M vs. PHIN: $2.68B
CAAS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $139.09M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $80.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAAS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than CAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAAS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAAS is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

CAAS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.79% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +5.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.49% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.68B) has a higher market cap than CAAS($139M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than CAAS: PHIN (31.30) vs CAAS (4.15). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 11.357 vs. CAAS (9.155). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. CAAS (52.3M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. CAAS (139M). CAAS has less debt than PHIN: CAAS (81.2M) vs PHIN (1.05B). PHIN has higher revenues than CAAS: PHIN (3.43B) vs CAAS (725M).
CAASPHINCAAS / PHIN
Capitalization139M2.68B5%
EBITDA52.3M418M13%
Gain YTD9.15511.35781%
P/E Ratio4.1531.3013%
Revenue725M3.43B21%
Total Cash139M349M40%
Total Debt81.2M1.05B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAAS: Fundamental Ratings
CAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAASPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTMIX16.900.16
+0.96%
GMO International Opportunistic Val III
PWDCX10.950.10
+0.92%
DF Tactical Dividend Fund C
HFDYX19.750.04
+0.20%
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps Y
TIOPX17.27-0.04
-0.23%
Nuveen International Opps Prem
RGLDX28.98-0.12
-0.41%
American Funds Global Insight R-3

CAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAAS has been loosely correlated with APTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAAS jumps, then APTV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAAS
1D Price
Change %
CAAS100%
-3.53%
APTV - CAAS
33%
Loosely correlated
-6.03%
PLOW - CAAS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
DAN - CAAS
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
ALV - CAAS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
PHIN - CAAS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.55%
ALV - PHIN
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
BWA - PHIN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
APTV - PHIN
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.03%
VC - PHIN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
ALSN - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
More