CAAP
Price
$26.50
Change
+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.32B
111 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAC
Price
$231.98
Change
-$1.29 (-0.55%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.03B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAAP vs PAC

Header iconCAAP vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts CAAP vs PACBanner chart's image
Corporacion America Airports SA
Price$26.50
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Volume$120.12K
Capitalization4.32B
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$231.98
Change-$1.29 (-0.55%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.03B
CAAP vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
CAAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAAP vs. PAC commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAAP is a StrongBuy and PAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CAAP: $26.40 vs. PAC: $233.19)
Brand notoriety: CAAP and PAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAAP: 38% vs. PAC: 36%
Market capitalization -- CAAP: $4.26B vs. PAC: $12.03B
CAAP [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $4.26B. PAC’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $12.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $58.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the long-term than CAAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAAP is a better buy in the short-term than PAC.

Price Growth

CAAP (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +12.32% price change this week, while PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAAP is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

PAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (+0.01% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAC($12B) has a higher market cap than CAAP($4.32B). CAAP has higher P/E ratio than PAC: CAAP (24.31) vs PAC (21.75). CAAP YTD gains are higher at: 41.452 vs. PAC (38.271). PAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.5B vs. CAAP (636M). PAC has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. CAAP (595M). PAC has higher revenues than CAAP: PAC (39.8B) vs CAAP (1.87B).
CAAPPACCAAP / PAC
Capitalization4.32B12B36%
EBITDA636M21.5B3%
Gain YTD41.45238.271108%
P/E Ratio24.3121.75112%
Revenue1.87B39.8B5%
Total Cash595M9.7B6%
Total Debt1.15BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAAP vs PAC: Fundamental Ratings
CAAP
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
317
SMR RATING
1..100
6719
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAAP's Valuation (68) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (79). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (17). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's SMR Rating (19) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAAP (67). This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAAP’s over the last 12 months.

CAAP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (47). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAAP's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAC (44). This means that CAAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAAPPAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQE102.801.02
+1.00%
Direxion NASDAQ-100® Equal Wtd ETF
SEPW31.700.06
+0.19%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Sep ETF
AAPR28.210.04
+0.14%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF 2 YrToApl2026
AUGU29.38N/A
N/A
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncAugETF
CSRE26.01-0.05
-0.19%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF

CAAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAAP has been loosely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAAP jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAAP
1D Price
Change %
CAAP100%
+0.98%
ASR - CAAP
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
PAC - CAAP
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
OMAB - CAAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
JOBY - CAAP
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
SRTA - CAAP
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
-2.03%
OMAB - PAC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
ASR - PAC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
CAAP - PAC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
ASRMF - PAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAEF - PAC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More