CAAP
Price
$21.43
Change
+$0.40 (+1.90%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.49B
66 days until earnings call
PAC
Price
$249.93
Change
+$2.86 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.63B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAAP vs PAC

Header iconCAAP vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts CAAP vs PACBanner chart's image
Corporacion America Airports SA
Price$21.43
Change+$0.40 (+1.90%)
Volume$205.06K
Capitalization3.49B
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$249.93
Change+$2.86 (+1.16%)
Volume$42.32K
Capitalization12.63B
CAAP vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAAP vs. PAC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAAP is a StrongBuy and PAC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CAAP: $21.43 vs. PAC: $249.93)
Brand notoriety: CAAP and PAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAAP: 164% vs. PAC: 53%
Market capitalization -- CAAP: $3.49B vs. PAC: $12.63B
CAAP [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $3.49B. PAC’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $12.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $58.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $7.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CAAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the long-term than CAAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the short-term than CAAP.

Price Growth

CAAP (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +3.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

PAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (-1.76% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAC($12.6B) has a higher market cap than CAAP($3.5B). PAC has higher P/E ratio than CAAP: PAC (25.13) vs CAAP (22.80). PAC YTD gains are higher at: 48.197 vs. CAAP (14.845).
CAAPPACCAAP / PAC
Capitalization3.5B12.6B28%
EBITDA711MN/A-
Gain YTD14.84548.19731%
P/E Ratio22.8025.1391%
Revenue1.86BN/A-
Total Cash524MN/A-
Total Debt1.15BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAAP vs PAC: Fundamental Ratings
CAAP
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7968
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
514
SMR RATING
1..100
5819
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
422
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAAP's Valuation (57) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (73). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (14). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's SMR Rating (19) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAAP (58). This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAAP’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CAAP (47). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CAAP’s over the last 12 months.

CAAP's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (22). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAAPPAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIIFX12.72N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Balanced I
GQRPX18.70N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Inv
CNRUX26.80N/A
N/A
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq Instl
LMVOX29.93N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F3
PEIYX38.06-0.21
-0.55%
Putnam Large Cap Value Y

CAAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAAP and FLGZY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAAP and FLGZY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAAP
1D Price
Change %
CAAP100%
+1.90%
FLGZY - CAAP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAC - CAAP
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
ASR - CAAP
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
OMAB - CAAP
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
SOAR - CAAP
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
+1.16%
OMAB - PAC
71%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
ASR - PAC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
ASLE - PAC
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
SRTA - PAC
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
CAAP - PAC
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More