C
Price
$121.36
Change
-$1.14 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jan 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
220.62B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$94.28
Change
-$2.11 (-2.19%)
Updated
Jan 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
302.54B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs WFC

Header iconC vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts C vs WFCBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$121.36
Change-$1.14 (-0.93%)
Volume$48.08K
Capitalization220.62B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$94.28
Change-$2.11 (-2.19%)
Volume$122.4K
Capitalization302.54B
C vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. WFC commentary
Jan 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 08, 2026
Stock price -- (C: $122.48 vs. WFC: $96.39)
Brand notoriety: C and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 30% vs. WFC: 30%
Market capitalization -- C: $220.62B vs. WFC: $302.54B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $220.62B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $302.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $909.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $147.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the long-term than C.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both C and WFC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.50% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($303B) has a higher market cap than C($221B). C has higher P/E ratio than WFC: C (17.32) vs WFC (15.88). C YTD gains are higher at: 4.962 vs. WFC (3.417). WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. C (25B). WFC has less debt than C: WFC (214B) vs C (371B). C (85.4B) and WFC (82.8B) have equivalent revenues.
CWFCC / WFC
Capitalization221B303B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.9623.417145%
P/E Ratio17.3215.88109%
Revenue85.4B82.8B103%
Total Cash25B34.8B72%
Total Debt371B214B173%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
C
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9188
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
188
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
721
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7343
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (77) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (79) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (18) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (2) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (21) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (73) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQJ38.740.87
+2.31%
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
BOEU42.740.55
+1.31%
Direxion Daily BA Bull 2X Shares
SPYG107.740.58
+0.54%
State Street SPDR Port S&P 500 Gr ETF
LDEM60.030.28
+0.47%
iShares® ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
PNI6.950.03
+0.43%
PIMCO NEW YORK Municipal Income FUND II

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
-0.67%
BAC - C
84%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
WFC - C
81%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
JPM - C
80%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
BK - C
77%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BCS - C
66%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+0.01%
BAC - WFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
C - WFC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
JPM - WFC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
BK - WFC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More