C
Price
$111.74
Change
+$0.65 (+0.59%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
199.93B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$92.59
Change
+$1.90 (+2.10%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
290.65B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs WFC

Header iconC vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts C vs WFCBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$111.74
Change+$0.65 (+0.59%)
Volume$10.83M
Capitalization199.93B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$92.59
Change+$1.90 (+2.10%)
Volume$15.51M
Capitalization290.65B
C vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. WFC commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a StrongBuy and WFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (C: $111.74 vs. WFC: $92.59)
Brand notoriety: C and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 86% vs. WFC: 102%
Market capitalization -- C: $199.93B vs. WFC: $290.65B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $199.93B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $290.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $863.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the long-term than C.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than C.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.66% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +2.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($291B) has a higher market cap than C($200B). C (15.69) and WFC (15.25) have similar P/E ratio . C YTD gains are higher at: 63.148 vs. WFC (34.684). WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. C (25B). WFC has less debt than C: WFC (214B) vs C (373B). C (83.3B) and WFC (82.8B) have equivalent revenues.
CWFCC / WFC
Capitalization200B291B69%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD63.14834.684182%
P/E Ratio15.6915.25103%
Revenue83.3B82.8B101%
Total Cash25B34.8B72%
Total Debt373B214B174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
C
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3130
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
197
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1026
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (72) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (19) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (2) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (26) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for C (76) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVLC79.750.29
+0.36%
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
MARB20.72N/A
+0.01%
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
LIBD287.58N/A
N/A
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF
QQQY24.25-0.17
-0.70%
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Target 30 Income ETF
SCHF23.81-0.56
-2.30%
Schwab International Equity ETF™

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
+0.59%
BAC - C
84%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
WFC - C
82%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
JPM - C
80%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
BK - C
77%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
BCS - C
66%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+2.10%
BAC - WFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
C - WFC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
JPM - WFC
76%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
BK - WFC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
More