C
Price
$100.67
Change
-$2.20 (-2.14%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
180.13B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBS
Price
$39.07
Change
-$0.53 (-1.34%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
122.7B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs UBS

Header iconC vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts C vs UBSBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$100.67
Change-$2.20 (-2.14%)
Volume$11.43M
Capitalization180.13B
UBS Group AG
Price$39.07
Change-$0.53 (-1.34%)
Volume$1.67M
Capitalization122.7B
C vs UBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. UBS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a Buy and UBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (C: $100.67 vs. UBS: $39.07)
Brand notoriety: C: Notable vs. UBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 87% vs. UBS: 95%
Market capitalization -- C: $180.13B vs. UBS: $122.7B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $180.13B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $122.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $842.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $141.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both C and UBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.98% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($180B) has a higher market cap than UBS($123B). UBS has higher P/E ratio than C: UBS (17.60) vs C (14.14). C YTD gains are higher at: 46.985 vs. UBS (34.805). UBS has more cash in the bank: 223B vs. C (25B). UBS has less debt than C: UBS (348B) vs C (373B). C has higher revenues than UBS: C (83.3B) vs UBS (45.6B).
CUBSC / UBS
Capitalization180B123B146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.98534.805135%
P/E Ratio14.1417.6080%
Revenue83.3B45.6B183%
Total Cash25B223B11%
Total Debt373B348B107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
C
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
104
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
229
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7880
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (67) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (74) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (6) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

C's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (80) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABOT40.61N/A
N/A
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF
GHYG45.74-0.14
-0.32%
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bd ETF
OEF338.65-6.27
-1.82%
iShares S&P 100 ETF
JETS25.18-0.51
-1.99%
US Global Jets ETF
DISO12.03-0.91
-7.01%
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
-2.14%
BAC - C
83%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
JPM - C
82%
Closely correlated
-3.41%
WFC - C
81%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
BK - C
77%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
BCS - C
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
+1.59%
BCS - UBS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
C - UBS
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
MUFG - UBS
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
HSBC - UBS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
BK - UBS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
More