C
Price
$81.69
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
121.12B
83 days until earnings call
UBS
Price
$34.80
Change
-$0.31 (-0.88%)
Updated
Jan 22, 02:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.65B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

C vs UBS

Header iconC vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts C vs UBSBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$81.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$89.43K
Capitalization121.12B
UBS Group AG
Price$34.80
Change-$0.31 (-0.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization98.65B
C vs UBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. UBS commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a Hold and UBS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (C: $81.67 vs. UBS: $35.10)
Brand notoriety: C: Notable vs. UBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 148% vs. UBS: 146%
Market capitalization -- C: $121.12B vs. UBS: $98.65B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $121.12B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $98.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBS is a better buy in the long-term than C.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBS is a better buy in the short-term than C.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +11.12% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +8.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.07% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($121B) has a higher market cap than UBS($98.7B). C has higher P/E ratio than UBS: C (15.71) vs UBS (3.61). C (16.025) and UBS (15.765) have similar YTD gains . UBS has more cash in the bank: 144B vs. C (27.3B). C has less debt than UBS: C (324B) vs UBS (378B). C has higher revenues than UBS: C (78.5B) vs UBS (39.4B).
CUBSC / UBS
Capitalization121B98.7B123%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.02515.765102%
P/E Ratio15.713.61435%
Revenue78.5B39.4B199%
Total Cash27.3B144B19%
Total Debt324B378B86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
C
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
584
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
592
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (68) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for C (58) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than C’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (43) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for C (59) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
+2.10%
BAC - C
78%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
JPM - C
70%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
WFC - C
70%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
BMO - C
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
TD - C
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
+3.11%
MUFG - UBS
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.07%
RY - UBS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
SMFG - UBS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
C - UBS
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
BAC - UBS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More