C
Price
$117.43
Change
-$0.28 (-0.24%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
205.21B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBS
Price
$44.85
Change
-$2.82 (-5.92%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
138.59B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs UBS

Header iconC vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts C vs UBSBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$117.43
Change-$0.28 (-0.24%)
Volume$12.41M
Capitalization205.21B
UBS Group AG
Price$44.85
Change-$2.82 (-5.92%)
Volume$4.7M
Capitalization138.59B
C vs UBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. UBS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a StrongBuy and UBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (C: $117.43 vs. UBS: $44.85)
Brand notoriety: C: Notable vs. UBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 87% vs. UBS: 215%
Market capitalization -- C: $205.21B vs. UBS: $138.59B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $205.21B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $138.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $855.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $147.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.36% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -6.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.13% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($205B) has a higher market cap than UBS($139B). UBS has higher P/E ratio than C: UBS (19.00) vs C (16.80). C YTD gains are higher at: 1.159 vs. UBS (-3.153). UBS has more cash in the bank: 223B vs. C (23.5B). UBS has less debt than C: UBS (342B) vs C (371B). C has higher revenues than UBS: C (85.4B) vs UBS (46.1B).
CUBSC / UBS
Capitalization205B139B147%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.159-3.153-37%
P/E Ratio16.8019.0088%
Revenue85.4B46.1B185%
Total Cash23.5B223B11%
Total Debt371B342B108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
C
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2610
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2465
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (74) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (26) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (6) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (45) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

C's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (65) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPTY30.960.47
+1.53%
Vident U.S. Diversified Real Estate ETF
SGDM79.750.43
+0.54%
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
GLQ8.220.03
+0.43%
Clough Global Equity Fund
HFGM32.520.01
+0.03%
Unlimited Hfgm Global Macro ETF
TQQQ49.76-2.76
-5.26%
ProShares UltraPro QQQ

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
-0.24%
WFC - C
85%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
BAC - C
83%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
BCS - C
77%
Closely correlated
-3.63%
UBS - C
74%
Closely correlated
-5.92%
JPM - C
74%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
-5.92%
MUFG - UBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
HSBC - UBS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
ING - UBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
BCS - UBS
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.63%
C - UBS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More