C
Price
$68.37
Change
-$0.06 (-0.09%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
121.12B
78 days until earnings call
UBS
Price
$30.28
Change
+$0.26 (+0.87%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.65B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

C vs UBS

Header iconC vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts C vs UBSBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$68.37
Change-$0.06 (-0.09%)
Volume$12.68K
Capitalization121.12B
UBS Group AG
Price$30.28
Change+$0.26 (+0.87%)
Volume$36K
Capitalization98.65B
C vs UBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. UBS commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a Buy and UBS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (C: $68.43 vs. UBS: $30.02)
Brand notoriety: C: Notable vs. UBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 64% vs. UBS: 51%
Market capitalization -- C: $121.12B vs. UBS: $98.65B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $121.12B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $98.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBS is a better buy in the long-term than C.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both C and UBS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +8.19% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +7.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +71.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+4.15% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($121B) has a higher market cap than UBS($98.7B). C has higher P/E ratio than UBS: C (15.71) vs UBS (3.61). UBS YTD gains are higher at: 2.193 vs. C (-2.111). UBS has more cash in the bank: 144B vs. C (27.3B). C has less debt than UBS: C (324B) vs UBS (378B). C has higher revenues than UBS: C (78.5B) vs UBS (39.4B).
CUBSC / UBS
Capitalization121B98.7B123%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.1112.193-96%
P/E Ratio15.713.61435%
Revenue78.5B39.4B199%
Total Cash27.3B144B19%
Total Debt324B378B86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
C
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
208
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4313
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (19) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (50) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (43) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (6) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for C (89) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew significantly faster than C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA284.9525.44
+9.80%
Tesla
GME27.460.38
+1.40%
GameStop Corp
SPY550.643.95
+0.72%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL209.280.91
+0.44%
Apple
BTC.X93754.840000-892.085940
-0.94%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
+0.40%
BAC - C
85%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
WFC - C
80%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
JPM - C
79%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
BCS - C
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
BMO - C
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
+0.70%
BCS - UBS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
HSBC - UBS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
C - UBS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
BAC - UBS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
JPM - UBS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More