C
Price
$95.90
Change
+$0.50 (+0.52%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
175.62B
36 days until earnings call
MUFG
Price
$15.59
Change
+$0.32 (+2.10%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
173.99B
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs MUFG

Header iconC vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts C vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$95.90
Change+$0.50 (+0.52%)
Volume$100.92K
Capitalization175.62B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.59
Change+$0.32 (+2.10%)
Volume$12.01K
Capitalization173.99B
C vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. MUFG commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a StrongBuy and MUFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (C: $95.40 vs. MUFG: $15.27)
Brand notoriety: C: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 117% vs. MUFG: 126%
Market capitalization -- C: $175.62B vs. MUFG: $173.99B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $175.62B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $173.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the long-term than C.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than C.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.10% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($176B) and MUFG($174B) have the same market capitalization . MUFG (14.17) and C (14.09) have similar P/E ratio . C YTD gains are higher at: 38.465 vs. MUFG (30.290). C has less debt than MUFG: C (373B) vs MUFG (46.25T).
CMUFGC / MUFG
Capitalization176B174B101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.46530.290127%
P/E Ratio14.0914.1799%
RevenueN/A6.72T-
Total Cash25BN/A-
Total Debt373B46.25T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
C
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2911
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7132
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (65) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (87) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (29) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUFG (45) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for C (71) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAD.X0.6909870.020380
+3.04%
Radworks cryptocurrency
CHZ.X0.0400480.000992
+2.54%
Chiliz cryptocurrency
JBTM141.49-0.22
-0.16%
JBT Marel Corporation
FUN.X0.009353-0.000126
-1.33%
FUNToken cryptocurrency
ALPACA.X0.019308-0.000329
-1.68%
Alpaca Finance cryptocurrency

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
-1.73%
BAC - C
84%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
WFC - C
80%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
JPM - C
80%
Closely correlated
-3.11%
BK - C
73%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
BCS - C
66%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
-0.72%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
UBS - MUFG
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
BCS - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
WFC - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
C - MUFG
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
More