C
Price
$100.39
Change
+$0.55 (+0.55%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
178.64B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MUFG
Price
$15.22
Change
+$0.24 (+1.60%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:13 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
167.71B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs MUFG

Header iconC vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts C vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$100.39
Change+$0.55 (+0.55%)
Volume$13.52K
Capitalization178.64B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.22
Change+$0.24 (+1.60%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization167.71B
C vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. MUFG commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a Hold and MUFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (C: $99.84 vs. MUFG: $14.99)
Brand notoriety: C: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 238% vs. MUFG: 102%
Market capitalization -- C: $178.64B vs. MUFG: $167.71B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $178.64B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $167.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $822.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the long-term than C.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the short-term than MUFG.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.09% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was -1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($179B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($168B). MUFG (14.29) and C (14.02) have similar P/E ratio . C YTD gains are higher at: 44.909 vs. MUFG (27.901). C has less debt than MUFG: C (373B) vs MUFG (46.25T). MUFG has higher revenues than C: MUFG (6.72T) vs C (83.3B).
CMUFGC / MUFG
Capitalization179B168B107%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.90927.901161%
P/E Ratio14.0214.2998%
Revenue83.3B6.72T1%
Total Cash24.5BN/A-
Total Debt373B46.25T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
C
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7875
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2313
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7836
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8539

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (67) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (88) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (47) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for C (78) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHVN16.661.36
+8.89%
Biohaven Ltd
VSME1.410.07
+5.60%
VS Media Holdings Limited
ONB21.710.46
+2.16%
Old National Bancorp
PSBD12.50-0.02
-0.16%
Palmer Square Capital BDC
MSBIP23.88-0.17
-0.71%
Midland States Bancorp

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
+3.89%
BAC - C
84%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
JPM - C
81%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
WFC - C
79%
Closely correlated
+7.15%
BK - C
73%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
BCS - C
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+1.15%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
HSBC - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
UBS - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
WFC - MUFG
56%
Loosely correlated
+7.15%
More