C
Price
$118.04
Change
+$0.58 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
206.27B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JPM
Price
$312.47
Change
+$3.21 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
842.48B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs JPM

Header iconC vs JPM Comparison
Open Charts C vs JPMBanner chart's image
Citigroup
Price$118.04
Change+$0.58 (+0.49%)
Volume$17.15M
Capitalization206.27B
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$312.47
Change+$3.21 (+1.04%)
Volume$14.65M
Capitalization842.48B
C vs JPM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
C vs. JPM commentary
Jan 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a Hold and JPM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2026
Stock price -- (C: $118.04 vs. JPM: $312.47)
Brand notoriety: C and JPM are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 124% vs. JPM: 144%
Market capitalization -- C: $206.27B vs. JPM: $842.48B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $206.27B. JPM’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $842.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $842.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $145.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileJPM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • JPM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the long-term than JPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both C and JPM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а -2.70% price change this week, while JPM (@Major Banks) price change was -5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

JPM is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.50% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($842B) has a higher market cap than C($206B). C has higher P/E ratio than JPM: C (16.89) vs JPM (15.61). C YTD gains are higher at: 1.157 vs. JPM (-2.589). C has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. JPM (21.8B). C has less debt than JPM: C (371B) vs JPM (497B). JPM has higher revenues than C: JPM (179B) vs C (85.4B).
CJPMC / JPM
Capitalization206B842B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.157-2.589-45%
P/E Ratio16.8915.61108%
Revenue85.4B179B48%
Total Cash25B21.8B115%
Total Debt371B497B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs JPM: Fundamental Ratings
C
JPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8685
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2111
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (74) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as JPM (83) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (21) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPM (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPM’s over the last 12 months.

C's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as JPM (29) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CJPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NURE29.270.29
+1.01%
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
MUSI44.24-0.07
-0.16%
American Century Multisector Income ETF
DGCB54.47-0.10
-0.18%
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
IVE217.26-0.51
-0.23%
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
JAPN25.32-0.19
-0.75%
Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
+0.49%
BAC - C
83%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
WFC - C
80%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
JPM - C
79%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
BK - C
72%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
BCS - C
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
+1.04%
BAC - JPM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
C - JPM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
WFC - JPM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
BK - JPM
71%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
BCS - JPM
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More