BZZUY
Price
$26.06
Change
-$0.43 (-1.62%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.27B
51 days until earnings call
LOMA
Price
$11.58
Change
-$0.76 (-6.16%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUY vs LOMA

Header iconBZZUY vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts BZZUY vs LOMABanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$26.06
Change-$0.43 (-1.62%)
Volume$226
Capitalization5.27B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$11.58
Change-$0.76 (-6.16%)
Volume$461.68K
Capitalization1.01B
BZZUY vs LOMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUY vs. LOMA commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUY is a Hold and LOMA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUY: $26.06 vs. LOMA: $11.58)
Brand notoriety: BZZUY and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUY: 4% vs. LOMA: 128%
Market capitalization -- BZZUY: $5.27B vs. LOMA: $1.01B
BZZUY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $5.27B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the long-term than BZZUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LOMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BZZUY (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was -4.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZZUY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.08% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZZUY($5.27B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.01B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than BZZUY: LOMA (20.19) vs BZZUY (11.09). BZZUY YTD gains are higher at: 47.105 vs. LOMA (-3.015). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.9B vs. BZZUY (1.02B). LOMA has higher revenues than BZZUY: LOMA (136B) vs BZZUY (4B).
BZZUYLOMABZZUY / LOMA
Capitalization5.27B1.01B522%
EBITDA1.02B39.9B3%
Gain YTD47.105-3.015-1,562%
P/E Ratio11.0920.1955%
Revenue4B136B3%
Total CashN/A20.9B-
Total DebtN/A97.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUY vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUY
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1317
SMR RATING
1..100
7148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2562
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUY (14) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (17) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUY’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's SMR Rating (48) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUY (71) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (50) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUY’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (62) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRETX11.55-0.10
-0.86%
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Inv
MALRX22.33-0.25
-1.11%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Instl
GENIX13.11-0.17
-1.28%
Gotham Enhanced Return Institutional
FAOFX16.96-0.22
-1.28%
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
PMAQX45.54-0.70
-1.51%
Principal MidCap R6

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
N/A
HDLMY - BZZUY
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.91%
HCMLY - BZZUY
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.32%
BZZUF - BZZUY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUY
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.16%
AHCHY - BZZUY
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with KNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then KNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-6.16%
KNF - LOMA
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.19%
CRH - LOMA
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
CX - LOMA
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
USLM - LOMA
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
JHX - LOMA
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
More