BZZUY
Price
$25.39
Change
+$0.34 (+1.36%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
9.35B
80 days until earnings call
LOMA
Price
$10.50
Change
-$0.27 (-2.51%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUY vs LOMA

Header iconBZZUY vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts BZZUY vs LOMABanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$25.39
Change+$0.34 (+1.36%)
Volume$274
Capitalization9.35B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$10.50
Change-$0.27 (-2.51%)
Volume$247.09K
Capitalization1.25B
BZZUY vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZZUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUY vs. LOMA commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUY is a StrongBuy and LOMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUY: $25.39 vs. LOMA: $10.50)
Brand notoriety: BZZUY and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUY: 72% vs. LOMA: 65%
Market capitalization -- BZZUY: $9.35B vs. LOMA: $1.25B
BZZUY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $9.35B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the long-term than BZZUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZZUY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZZUY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

BZZUY (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was -7.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZZUY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.43% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZZUY($9.35B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.25B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than BZZUY: LOMA (31.10) vs BZZUY (8.68). BZZUY YTD gains are higher at: 43.295 vs. LOMA (-12.060).
BZZUYLOMABZZUY / LOMA
Capitalization9.35B1.25B748%
EBITDAN/A245B-
Gain YTD43.295-12.060-359%
P/E Ratio8.6831.1028%
RevenueN/A683B-
Total CashN/A10.6B-
Total DebtN/A200B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUY vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUY
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2024
SMR RATING
1..100
7151
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
226
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUY (14) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (24) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUY’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's SMR Rating (51) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUY (71) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUY (57) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUY (22) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZZUYLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZZUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWX65.150.69
+1.07%
SPDR® S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
IDE12.220.09
+0.74%
Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund
BNDS50.120.03
+0.06%
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
IEI118.76-0.09
-0.08%
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
BAMY27.71-0.04
-0.14%
Brookstone Yield ETF

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
N/A
HDLMY - BZZUY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
HCMLY - BZZUY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
BZZUF - BZZUY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUY
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
AHCHY - BZZUY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-2.51%
CX - LOMA
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
KNF - LOMA
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
CRH - LOMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
EXP - LOMA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
MLM - LOMA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More