BZZUY
Price
$30.14
Change
+$0.17 (+0.57%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
10.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HCMLY
Price
$18.29
Change
-$0.12 (-0.65%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
50.51B
105 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUY vs HCMLY

Header iconBZZUY vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts BZZUY vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$30.14
Change+$0.17 (+0.57%)
Volume$1.16K
Capitalization10.84B
HOLCIM
Price$18.29
Change-$0.12 (-0.65%)
Volume$73.88K
Capitalization50.51B
BZZUY vs HCMLY Comparison Chart in %
BZZUY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCMLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUY vs. HCMLY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUY is a Hold and HCMLY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUY: $30.15 vs. HCMLY: $18.29)
Brand notoriety: BZZUY and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUY: 102% vs. HCMLY: 65%
Market capitalization -- BZZUY: $10.84B vs. HCMLY: $50.51B
BZZUY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $10.84B. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $50.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the long-term than HCMLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZZUY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZZUY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the short-term than BZZUY.

Price Growth

BZZUY (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.14% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was +5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.05% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($50.5B) has a higher market cap than BZZUY($10.8B). HCMLY has higher P/E ratio than BZZUY: HCMLY (12.89) vs BZZUY (10.42). BZZUY YTD gains are higher at: 70.164 vs. HCMLY (63.171). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.95B vs. BZZUY (1.46B). HCMLY has more cash in the bank: 4.24B vs. BZZUY (1.28B). HCMLY has higher revenues than BZZUY: HCMLY (26.2B) vs BZZUY (4.45B).
BZZUYHCMLYBZZUY / HCMLY
Capitalization10.8B50.5B21%
EBITDA1.46B6.95B21%
Gain YTD70.16463.171111%
P/E Ratio10.4212.8981%
Revenue4.45B26.2B17%
Total Cash1.28B4.24B30%
Total Debt602MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUY vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUY
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
142
SMR RATING
1..100
4944
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (16). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (14). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (49). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (44). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLY (71). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZZUYHCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZZUY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCMLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMAP24.330.05
+0.20%
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
SHYD22.79N/A
N/A
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
FUTY57.31-0.77
-1.33%
Fidelity MSCI Utilities ETF
PWER33.23-0.67
-1.97%
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF
SPYC42.80-1.04
-2.36%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
N/A
HDLMY - BZZUY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
HCMLY - BZZUY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
EXP - BZZUY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
CX - BZZUY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
JHX - BZZUY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
-0.65%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.73%
MLM - HCMLY
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
More