BZZUY
Price
$26.16
Change
+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.33B
58 days until earnings call
CBUMF
Price
$0.72
Change
+$0.17 (+30.91%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUY vs CBUMF

Header iconBZZUY vs CBUMF Comparison
Open Charts BZZUY vs CBUMFBanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$26.16
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Volume$582
Capitalization9.33B
China National Buildings Material
Price$0.72
Change+$0.17 (+30.91%)
Volume$157
Capitalization4.98B
BZZUY vs CBUMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZZUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUY vs. CBUMF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUY is a StrongBuy and CBUMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUY: $26.16 vs. CBUMF: $0.72)
Brand notoriety: BZZUY and CBUMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUY: 56% vs. CBUMF: 15%
Market capitalization -- BZZUY: $9.33B vs. CBUMF: $4.98B
BZZUY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $9.33B. CBUMF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $4.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCBUMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CBUMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the long-term than CBUMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZZUY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBUMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZZUY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CBUMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the short-term than CBUMF.

Price Growth

BZZUY (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while CBUMF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZZUY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.30% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZZUY($9.34B) has a higher market cap than CBUMF($4.98B). BZZUY has higher P/E ratio than CBUMF: BZZUY (8.98) vs CBUMF (7.43). CBUMF YTD gains are higher at: 67.894 vs. BZZUY (47.641).
BZZUYCBUMFBZZUY / CBUMF
Capitalization9.34B4.98B187%
EBITDA1.46BN/A-
Gain YTD47.64167.89470%
P/E Ratio8.987.43121%
Revenue4.45BN/A-
Total Cash1.28BN/A-
Total Debt602MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUY vs CBUMF: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUY
CBUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
5063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBUMF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (14). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBUMF (100). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew significantly faster than CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMF (63). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew similarly to CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (50). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBUMF (100). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew significantly faster than CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZZUYCBUMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZZUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URNM51.790.69
+1.35%
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
RYLG22.440.09
+0.39%
Global X Russell 2000 Cov Cl & Gr ETF
JULP29.70-0.01
-0.05%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jul
IAE7.15-0.01
-0.14%
VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND
RSPF77.38-1.23
-1.56%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
+0.38%
HDLMY - BZZUY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
HCMLY - BZZUY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
BZZUF - BZZUY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUY
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
AHCHY - BZZUY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More

CBUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBUMF and JHX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBUMF and JHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMF
1D Price
Change %
CBUMF100%
N/A
JHX - CBUMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
CBUMY - CBUMF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
RETO - CBUMF
12%
Poorly correlated
+14.70%
TGLS - CBUMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
BZZUY - CBUMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More