BZZUF
Price
$58.56
Change
+$3.03 (+5.46%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.06B
LOMA
Price
$7.62
Change
-$0.11 (-1.42%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
977.05M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUF vs LOMA

Header iconBZZUF vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts BZZUF vs LOMABanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$58.56
Change+$3.03 (+5.46%)
Volume$376
Capitalization10.06B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$7.62
Change-$0.11 (-1.42%)
Volume$652.17K
Capitalization977.05M
BZZUF vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUF vs. LOMA commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUF is a Hold and LOMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUF: $58.56 vs. LOMA: $7.62)
Brand notoriety: BZZUF and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUF: 14% vs. LOMA: 90%
Market capitalization -- BZZUF: $10.06B vs. LOMA: $977.05M
BZZUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $10.06B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $977.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUF is a better buy in the long-term than LOMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZZUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZZUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the short-term than BZZUF.

Price Growth

BZZUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was +5.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.60% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZZUF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($977M). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than BZZUF: LOMA (22.98) vs BZZUF (9.99). BZZUF YTD gains are higher at: 61.540 vs. LOMA (-36.181). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164B vs. BZZUF (1.46B). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. BZZUF (1.28B). BZZUF has less debt than LOMA: BZZUF (602M) vs LOMA (275B). LOMA has higher revenues than BZZUF: LOMA (667B) vs BZZUF (4.45B).
BZZUFLOMABZZUF / LOMA
Capitalization10.1B977M1,034%
EBITDA1.46B164B1%
Gain YTD61.540-36.181-170%
P/E Ratio9.9922.9843%
Revenue4.45B667B1%
Total Cash1.28B15.9B8%
Total Debt602M275B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUF vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUF
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1360
SMR RATING
1..100
5068
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4491
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1713
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUF (15) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (60) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (68) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (91) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUF (17) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZZUFLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOAR79.021.35
+1.74%
Loar Holdings
NBHC39.470.18
+0.46%
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS Corp
DBE19.590.07
+0.33%
Invesco DB Energy
HYAC11.39N/A
N/A
Haymaker Acquisition Corp
HOOX132.25-2.01
-1.50%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF

BZZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUF and THYCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUF and THYCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUF
1D Price
Change %
BZZUF100%
N/A
THYCY - BZZUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLY - BZZUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
BZZUY - BZZUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - BZZUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-1.42%
CX - LOMA
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
KNF - LOMA
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
CRH - LOMA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
USLM - LOMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
More