BZZUF
Price
$52.09
Change
+$2.09 (+4.18%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.28B
LOMA
Price
$11.31
Change
+$0.12 (+1.07%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUF vs LOMA

Header iconBZZUF vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts BZZUF vs LOMABanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$52.09
Change+$2.09 (+4.18%)
Volume$332
Capitalization7.28B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$11.31
Change+$0.12 (+1.07%)
Volume$160.79K
Capitalization1.01B
BZZUF vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUF vs. LOMA commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUF is a Buy and LOMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUF: $52.09 vs. LOMA: $11.31)
Brand notoriety: BZZUF and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUF: 66% vs. LOMA: 50%
Market capitalization -- BZZUF: $7.28B vs. LOMA: $1.01B
BZZUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $7.28B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUF is a better buy in the long-term than LOMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZZUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZZUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUF is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

BZZUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.75% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZZUF($7.28B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.01B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than BZZUF: LOMA (20.19) vs BZZUF (8.53). BZZUF YTD gains are higher at: 43.701 vs. LOMA (-5.276). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.9B vs. BZZUF (1.34B). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 20.9B vs. BZZUF (943M). BZZUF has less debt than LOMA: BZZUF (791M) vs LOMA (97.9B). LOMA has higher revenues than BZZUF: LOMA (136B) vs BZZUF (4.27B).
BZZUFLOMABZZUF / LOMA
Capitalization7.28B1.01B720%
EBITDA1.34B39.9B3%
Gain YTD43.701-5.276-828%
P/E Ratio8.5320.1942%
Revenue4.27B136B3%
Total Cash943M20.9B5%
Total Debt791M97.9B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUF vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUF
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1520
SMR RATING
1..100
4947
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2664
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUF (14) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (20) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's SMR Rating (47) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BZZUF (49) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (52) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (64) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZZUFLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFLY18.730.22
+1.19%
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
SPMO112.511.15
+1.03%
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
SEIV36.410.22
+0.61%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Fac ETF
RZB24.780.01
+0.04%
Reinsurance Group of America
XHYC37.19N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Cnsmr Cyclcls Sctr ETF

BZZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUF and THYCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUF and THYCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUF
1D Price
Change %
BZZUF100%
N/A
THYCY - BZZUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLY - BZZUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
BZZUY - BZZUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - BZZUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
+1.07%
CRH - LOMA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CX - LOMA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
KNF - LOMA
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
USLM - LOMA
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
EXP - LOMA
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More